Integrated Main Control Board Cross-Board MCU Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In rack communications devices, an MCU fault or reset during an in-service software upgrade (ISSU) process leads to service packet loss due to reduced forwarding capability, especially when the service volume is large, affecting normal communication service operation.

Innovation Solution

The integration of at least two main control boards with a control signal exchange path allows an MCU on one board to control an FU and SFU on another board, enabling seamless failover and maintaining forwarding capability, with a selector to choose between local and remote MCU control based on application scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If MCU and hardware forwarding unit are integrated on the same physical main control board, then device complexity is reduced and control efficiency is improved, but when MCU encounters fault or reset during ISSU, service packet loss occurs due to reduced forwarding capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration of MCU, FU, and SFU on physical main control boardVSAvoidservice continuity during MCU fault or ISSU
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control function is segmented from the forwarding function by allowing an MCU on one integrated main control board to control hardware forwarding units on another board. This segmentation enables independent operation of control and forwarding planes, so that when one MCU fails or undergoes ISSU, the other board's MCU can take over control without affecting forwarding capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control relationship between MCU and hardware forwarding unit is changed from a fixed local relationship to a flexible remote controllable relationship. By enabling cross-board control through control signal exchange paths, the system parameter of control topology is changed, allowing any MCU to control any hardware forwarding unit regardless of physical location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If an MCU controls only local FU and SFU on the same board, then control reliability is improved, but forwarding capability is reduced by half when another board's resources cannot be utilized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol reliability of local MCUVSAvoidforwarding capability when service volume is large
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The MCU is given universal control capability to manage not only local hardware forwarding units but also remote hardware forwarding units on other boards. This multi-functionality allows the system to dynamically allocate control resources and utilize forwarding capacity across multiple boards, increasing overall productivity when service volume is large.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

A control signal exchange path acts as an intermediary mechanism between MCUs on different boards and hardware forwarding units on different boards. This intermediary enables remote control without compromising the reliability of local control, allowing the system to scale forwarding capability while maintaining control integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If control signal exchange path is provided between MCUs on different boards, then service continuity is maintained during MCU fault or ISSU, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice continuity during failoverVSAvoidcontrol signal exchange path between boards
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control signal exchange paths between different boards are merged into a unified control network, allowing any MCU to communicate with any hardware forwarding unit on any board. This merging reduces the need for separate dedicated control paths and enables flexible failover while managing complexity through standardized communication interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP3355480B1Communication device, communication processing method, communication processing apparatus and communication system
Publication Date: 2020.07.15 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • EP3355480B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3355480B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3355480B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Embodiments of the present invention disclose a communications device, a communication processing method, a communication processing apparatus, and a communications system. The communications device includes at least two integrated main control boards that serve as a primary integrated main control board and a secondary integrated main control board. An MCU and a hardware forwarding unit are integrated on each of the integrated main control boards, and the hardware forwarding unit includes a fabric unit FU and a service forwarding unit SFU. A control signal exchange path is provided between the MCU on each integrated main control board and a hardware forwarding unit on another integrated main control board in the at least two integrated main control boards. An MCU on any one of the at least two integrated main control boards controls an FU and an SFU on the another integrated main control board in the at least two integrated main control boards by using the control signal exchange path. The present invention can resolve a problem that an MCU fault or reset and ISSU affect an FU and an SFU, and consequently a forwarding capability is reduced by half and a service packet loss is caused.