Cross-Border Data Transfer Visualization for Compliance Risk

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a growing need for improved systems and methods to manage personal data in compliance with privacy and security policies, as frequent breaches and misuse of personal data highlight the inadequacy of current tools and methods in protecting sensitive information and ensuring compliance with varying jurisdictional requirements.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for generating visualizations of data transfers, assessing risks associated with these transfers, and determining relative readiness in managing personal data, which involves identifying data assets, analyzing data elements, determining relevant regulations, and generating risk scores, as well as comparing privacy controls across entities to provide a relative readiness assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If organizations implement traditional data management policies and processes, then they can address basic privacy and security issues, but they cannot effectively comply with varying legal and industry requirements across different jurisdictions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidcompliance with varying jurisdictional requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides a universal data management platform that can handle multiple jurisdictions' requirements through a single interface. The visualization system displays data flows, storage locations, and regulatory requirements across different jurisdictions simultaneously, allowing organizations to manage compliance with varying legal and industry requirements through one unified system rather than separate systems for each jurisdiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments regulatory requirements by jurisdiction and displays them as distinct visual elements in the data map. Each jurisdiction's data handling requirements are broken down into manageable components that can be individually assessed and addressed, allowing organizations to tackle compliance requirements in discrete, organized units rather than as an overwhelming whole.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If organizations manually track and manage personal data transfers, then they can maintain some level of control, but the process becomes time-consuming and prone to errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transfer tracking accuracyVSAvoidtime for compliance monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual tracking mechanisms with automated computer-based visualization and analysis tools. The system automatically generates visual representations of data transfers, identifies compliance issues, and tracks personal data flows across the organization's infrastructure, eliminating the need for manual spreadsheet tracking and reducing human error while providing precise, real-time compliance monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-assessment of compliance status by automatically analyzing data transfer patterns against stored regulatory requirements. The visualization system autonomously identifies potential compliance issues and highlights areas requiring attention, allowing the organization to monitor its own compliance status without external intervention and reducing the time required for compliance checks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If organizations expand their data processing operations across multiple jurisdictions, then they can access broader markets, but they increase their exposure to regulatory compliance risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecross-border data processing capabilityVSAvoidregulatory compliance risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary compliance assessment before data transfers occur by visualizing planned data flows and automatically checking them against the regulatory requirements of destination jurisdictions. The system identifies potential compliance issues in advance, allowing organizations to adjust their data processing operations before executing cross-border transfers, thereby preventing regulatory violations rather than detecting them after the fact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides continuous feedback on compliance status through visual indicators in the data map. As organizations expand data processing operations, the system monitors each new data flow, compares it against applicable regulations, and provides real-time feedback on compliance status, enabling rapid adjustment of operations to maintain compliance as the organization grows its cross-border presence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11228620B2Data processing systems for data-transfer risk identification, cross-border visualization generation, and related methods
Publication Date: 2022.01.18 ONETRUST LLC
  • US11228620B2 patent drawing
  • US11228620B2 patent drawing
  • US11228620B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In particular embodiments, a Cross-Border Visualization Generation System is configured to: (1) identify one or more data assets associated with a particular entity; (2) analyze the one or more data assets to identify one or more data elements stored in the identified one or more data assets; (3) define a plurality of physical locations and identify, for each of the identified one or more data assets, a respective particular physical location of the plurality of physical locations; (4) analyze the identified one or more data elements to determine one or more data transfers between the one or more data systems in different particular physical locations; (5) determine one or more regulations that relate to the one or more data transfers; and (6) generate a visual representation of the one or more data transfers based at least in part on the one or more regulations.