Cross-Border Data Visualization for Privacy Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack effective methods to manage and comply with diverse personal data handling requirements across different jurisdictions, leading to increased risks of data breaches and unauthorized access, and individuals face challenges in minimizing data processing by entities they do not actively engage with.

Innovation Solution

A data model generation and population system that determines the type of operation and geographic location of computing systems, generates data structures for control actions, and provides questionnaires to users to assess compliance, comparing answers to identify relative readiness and suggesting improvements based on best practices from similarly situated entities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive data collection and processing is implemented to ensure compliance with diverse jurisdictional requirements, then compliance coverage is improved, but system complexity and data security risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments compliance requirements by jurisdiction and data type, organizing diverse regulatory obligations into structured categories. This allows the system to manage complexity through modular organization while maintaining comprehensive coverage across multiple jurisdictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary components including data brokers and verification services that mediate between entities and regulatory requirements. These intermediaries simplify compliance by handling data verification and validation, reducing the direct complexity burden on the core system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If extensive data processing by multiple entities is performed to enable comprehensive compliance assessment, then assessment accuracy is improved, but data security risks and unauthorized access potential increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance assessment accuracyVSAvoiddata security risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification and validation of data before it enters the main processing pipeline. By pre- validating data authenticity and compliance status, the system reduces security risks while maintaining assessment accuracy through controlled data flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where verification results and compliance assessments are continuously monitored and fed back into the system. This allows real-time detection of security anomalies and adjustment of processing parameters to maintain both accuracy and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If manual compliance verification processes are used to ensure thorough assessment, then verification accuracy is improved, but processing time and operational efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service compliance verification where entities can automatically submit and verify their own compliance status through standardized interfaces. This maintains verification accuracy through structured validation while dramatically improving processing efficiency by eliminating manual intervention for routine assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual verification processes with automated computational systems that use algorithms and data analysis to perform compliance assessments. This substitution maintains or improves verification accuracy while significantly increasing processing speed and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Device complexity

If individuals have limited control over which entities process their data, then system simplicity is maintained, but user privacy protection and data security are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidunauthorized data access
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a new dimension of user control through preference settings and consent management interfaces. Users can specify which entities may process their data and under what conditions, adding a layer of control without fundamentally complicating the underlying processing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11438386B2Data processing systems for data-transfer risk identification, cross-border visualization generation, and related methods
Publication Date: 2022.09.06 ONETRUST LLC
  • US11438386B2 patent drawing
  • US11438386B2 patent drawing
  • US11438386B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In particular embodiments, a Cross-Border Visualization Generation System is configured to: (1) identify one or more data assets associated with a particular entity; (2) analyze the one or more data assets to identify one or more data elements stored in the identified one or more data assets; (3) define a plurality of physical locations and identify, for each of the identified one or more data assets, a respective particular physical location of the plurality of physical locations; (4) analyze the identified one or more data elements to determine one or more data transfers between the one or more data systems in different particular physical locations; (5) determine one or more regulations that relate to the one or more data transfers; and (6) generate a visual representation of the one or more data transfers based at least in part on the one or more regulations.