Cross-Border Security Token Settlement Through Licensed Entities

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Regulatory challenges and compliance issues faced by cryptocurrency trading platforms due to tokens being deemed securities, leading to operational impracticality, revenue loss, or legal risks when trading across different jurisdictions.

Innovation Solution

A decentralized global liquidity and settlement system (GLASS) that enables compliant cross-border token trades by utilizing a network of licensed entities (settlement providers) to ensure regulatory compliance, allowing trades to be settled across multiple jurisdictions without impeding trading speeds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If trading platforms register as broker-dealer in each country to facilitate security token trading, then regulatory compliance is improved, but operational complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a centralized clearinghouse as an intermediary entity that assumes the role of broker-dealer in each jurisdiction. This clearinghouse acts as a mediator between trading platforms and regulators, enabling compliant security token trading without requiring individual platforms to register in every country. The clearinghouse handles regulatory compliance, settlement, and custody functions centrally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The clearinghouse is designed as a universal platform that operates across multiple jurisdictions simultaneously. It provides multi-functional services including trade matching, settlement, custody, and regulatory compliance in a single integrated system, eliminating the need for separate registration and operational setups in each country.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If trading platforms choose not to register as broker-dealer to avoid regulatory enforcement, then operational simplicity is maintained, but legal risk and enforcement action increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidlegal risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The clearinghouse serves as a protective intermediary that absorbs legal risk from unregistered trading platforms. By routing all security token trades through the registered clearinghouse, platforms can maintain operational simplicity while the clearinghouse assumes regulatory liability and protects against enforcement actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of regulatory enforcement risk into a beneficial protective mechanism. The clearinghouse structure transforms potential legal threats into a compliant trade settlement system, where regulators see the registered entity handling compliance while the trading platform maintains simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If trading platforms cease enabling trading in certain countries to avoid regulatory enforcement, then legal risk is reduced, but revenue loss occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory riskVSAvoidtrading volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The clearinghouse enables trading platforms to continue operating in regulated jurisdictions by acting as a compliant intermediary. It processes trades in countries where platforms would otherwise be blocked, maintaining trading volume while transferring regulatory risk to the registered clearinghouse entity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a new dimension to the trading architecture by introducing a centralized clearinghouse layer between trading platforms and regulators. This dimensional addition allows platforms to operate globally while compliance is handled at the clearinghouse level, preventing revenue loss from jurisdictional restrictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If security tokens are traded only on regulated trading systems and exchanges, then regulatory compliance is ensured, but trading accessibility and platform flexibility are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidtrading accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The clearinghouse acts as a universal intermediary that accepted trades from multiple types of platforms including unregistered exchanges, OTC desks, and centralized exchanges. It provides a single compliant entry point for diverse trading sources, ensuring regulatory compliance while maintaining broad trading accessibility and platform flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The clearinghouse is designed as a universal settlement platform that handles trades from various jurisdictions and platform types through standardized protocols. It provides multi-functional capabilities including trade matching, settlement, custody, and compliance in a single system that works with diverse trading participants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250322457A1Global liquidity and settlement system
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 FORGE GLOBAL INC
  • US20250322457A1 patent drawing
  • US20250322457A1 patent drawing
  • US20250322457A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for performing a digital currency escrow swap on a network of nodes is disclosed. The method includes placing transfer orders through an intermediate node and sending signed transfer order transactions with digital wallets to an escrow swap node. The method further includes performing a transfer-in order finishing operation by requesting a transfer of digital currency to the escrow swap node and receiving the digital currency via the transfer-in node. For each sell order, digital securities are transferred to the escrow swap node via the transfer-out node. The digital securities are sent from the escrow swap node. For each transfer-out order, the digital currency is sent to the transfer-out node. The method includes an analogous operation to finish a transfer-out order.