Cross-Channel Event Processor for Real-Time Security Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Enterprise-wide computing systems often operate independently, lacking the ability to collect and analyze events across components, which hinders real-time response to potential security issues and misses opportunities for targeted marketing.

Innovation Solution

Deploying event monitoring agents across the system to collect and send event information to a centralized event processing server, which analyzes and responds to security threats and marketing opportunities by applying security policies and predictive analytics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple systems operate independently without event collection and analysis, then system simplicity and operational independence are maintained, but real-time security response capability and cross-system event analysis are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity monitoring capabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into distributed event monitoring agents deployed at each endpoint and a centralized event processing server. Each agent independently monitors local events and forwards them to the server, which aggregates and analyzes events across all endpoints. This segmentation enables reliable security monitoring while maintaining operational independence at the agent level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The event processing server acts as an intermediary between distributed event monitoring agents and security response mechanisms. It receives events from agents, performs cross-channel analysis, and triggers appropriate responses. This intermediary architecture enables centralized intelligence without requiring direct complex interconnections between all system components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If event monitoring agents are deployed across the system to collect and analyze events in real-time, then security response capability and cross-channel analysis are improved, but system complexity and deployment overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time security response speedVSAvoidevent monitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Event monitoring agents are pre-deployed at each endpoint before security analysis is needed. These agents continuously collect and forward events to the processing server, enabling real-time security responses without requiring complex on-demand system assembly. The preliminary deployment of monitoring infrastructure eliminates latency in security event detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The event monitoring agents operate autonomously to collect, validate, and forward events to the processing server without requiring constant manual intervention. The system self-manages event collection and transmission, reducing operational complexity while maintaining high-speed real-time security monitoring capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If centralized event processing is implemented to analyze events from multiple endpoints, then cross-channel event analysis and targeted marketing capability are improved, but data aggregation complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecross-channel event analysis capabilityVSAvoidevent processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The event processing server is designed with multi-functionality to handle diverse event types from multiple endpoints (telephony, web, mobile, email) and provide both security monitoring and targeted marketing services. This universal platform analyzes cross-channel events for security threats while simultaneously enabling personalized marketing campaigns, reducing the need for separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts event analysis parameters and processing depth based on event type, source endpoint, and detected patterns. Rather than uniformly processing all events with maximum complexity, the system adapts processing intensity to match operational requirements, reducing overall processing complexity while maintaining sophisticated cross-channel analysis capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9800615B2Real-time security monitoring using cross-channel event processor
Publication Date: 2017.10.24 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US9800615B2 patent drawing
  • US9800615B2 patent drawing
  • US9800615B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects described herein provide systems and methods for computer system security monitoring. Multiple event monitoring agents may be deployed across an enterprise-wide computing system such that each event monitoring agent monitors at least one event generator of the enterprise-wide computing system. The event monitoring agents may be connected to an event processing server. The event processing server may receive event information generated by the event monitoring agents that describe events occurring at the event generators. The event processing server may perform a security analysis on at least a portion of the event information received that includes applying a security policy to the event information. The event processing server may execute a security response based on the security analysis performed such as, for example, a response specified in the security policy applied.