Cross-Channel Digital Form Integration System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems face challenges in digitizing various types of forms, including proper display across different user channels, onboarding unique templates, and inline editing, which hinders seamless form integration and presentation.

Innovation Solution

A cross-channel digital form integration and presentation system that identifies user input fields, generates prompts, transmits them to users, receives responses, updates forms, and stores data in a structured format, allowing for channel-specific display and expansion to support new channels and templates without system-wide updates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If forms are digitized to support multiple user channels (mobile, web, email, applications), then the system's adaptability and versatility improve, but the device complexity and difficulty of onboarding new templates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecross-channel form display capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity for supporting multiple channels
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments form handling into distinct channel-specific modules (mobile channel, web channel, email channel, application channel), where each channel has its own form display and interaction logic. This allows the system to support multiple channels without requiring a complete redesign for each one, as each channel operates as an independent but coordinated unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a universal form processing framework that can handle multiple types of forms (government forms, financial forms, contracts, agreements) across multiple channels (mobile, web, email, applications). The underlying architecture provides common functionalities such as form rendering, data validation, and submission handling that work across all channels, reducing overall system complexity despite the diverse requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If each form template is onboarded separately with unique formatting requirements, then the manufacturing precision of form display is improved, but the productivity and time required for onboarding decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveform template formatting accuracyVSAvoidform onboarding speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining channel-specific UI templates and formatting rules before forms need to be onboarded. Each channel has pre-configured templates that specify how forms should be displayed and interacted with on that channel. When a new form template needs to be added, the system can apply these pre-established formatting rules automatically, significantly reducing the time and effort required for onboarding while maintaining formatting precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If forms are displayed with channel-specific UI templates and layouts, then the ease of operation for each channel is improved, but the device complexity for managing multiple templates increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel-specific form interactionVSAvoidtemplate management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service capabilities where each channel automatically selects and applies its own UI template based on the detected channel type. The mobile channel automatically uses mobile-optimized templates, the web channel uses web-specific templates, and so on. This automatic self-service approach eliminates the need for manual template selection and management, reducing operational complexity while maintaining channel-specific optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If inline editing is enabled during form completion, then the ease of operation is improved, but the reliability of form data integrity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveform editing capabilityVSAvoidform data integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms during inline editing that provide real-time validation and confirmation to users. When users edit form fields inline, the system immediately checks the edited data against validation rules and provides feedback on whether the changes are acceptable. This allows users to easily edit forms while maintaining data integrity through continuous validation feedback, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240419894A1Cross channel digital data archiving and utilization system
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US20240419894A1 patent drawing
  • US20240419894A1 patent drawing
  • US20240419894A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the invention are directed to a system, method, or computer program product for convenient, secure digital data archiving and utilization across multiple communication channels. The method includes extracting one or more data input fields from a form and generating one or more user prompts to be presented to a user in order to complete at least one of the one or more entries of the one or more data input fields. The method further includes causing the transmission of at least one of the one or more user prompts to the user and receiving a prompt response from the user. The method further includes displaying to the user a completed generated form in an appropriate channel format, and provides a process for secure e-signature and cross-stream utilization of user input.