Cross-Device Interface Mapping for Mobile and Desktop Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current software configurations for enterprise computing often lack mechanisms to fully complement the functionality of mobile and desktop devices, leading to reduced user productivity and inefficient performance in tasks that require coordination across multiple devices.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced that enables user interface interactions between different computing devices by selecting a portion of a display screen on one device, using signals to map and display corresponding items on another device based on predetermined rules, which can include resolution, graphics resources, and contextual information, allowing for the sharing and adjustment of user interface features and data between devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If separate applications are installed on mobile and desktop devices to access similar functionality, then device-specific access is enabled, but device complexity and user productivity are reduced due to lack of integration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice-specific accessVSAvoiduser productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal interface framework that allows a single application to provide consistent functionality across multiple device types (mobile, desktop, tablet). The system uses device-agnostic interface definitions that can be rendered adaptively on different devices, eliminating the need for separate applications while maintaining device-specific optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary interface layer that sits between the application logic and device-specific implementations. This intermediary layer translates high-level interface definitions into device-specific renderings, enabling seamless integration across devices without requiring separate applications for each device type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If cloud-based applications are used on both devices, then accessibility is improved, but functional complementarity between devices is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidfunctional complementarity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables each device to access the same cloud-based application while applying device-specific quality adaptations. The system renders interface elements with local quality characteristics optimized for each device type (e.g., touch-optimized controls for mobile, keyboard-optimized controls for desktop) while maintaining access to the same underlying functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If similar operating systems are run on both devices, then software compatibility is improved, but the ability to leverage unique device functionalities is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware compatibilityVSAvoidefficient performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic interface adaptation system that adjusts the user interface based on the specific device characteristics while maintaining software compatibility. The system dynamically detects device properties and automatically optimizes interface rendering to leverage unique device functionalities (e.g., camera, GPS, touchscreen) without requiring different operating systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If no integration mechanisms are provided between devices, then device independence is maintained, but user productivity and functional synergy are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional synergyVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the integration system into independent, loosely-coupled components: interface definition layer, rendering layer, and device adaptation layer. This segmentation allows each component to operate independently while maintaining clear interfaces between them, reducing integration complexity while enabling functional synergy between devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11036354B2Integrating desktop and mobile devices
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US11036354B2 patent drawing
  • US11036354B2 patent drawing
  • US11036354B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for facilitating user interface interactions between different computing devices. An example method includes providing a first user option to select a first portion of a first user interface display screen presented on a first computing device; providing a signal based on the selected portion; and using the signal to display one or more items in a second user interface display screen via a second computing device based on the first portion and one or more mapping rules. In a more specific embodiment, the example method further includes providing a second user option to adjust the mapping rules. The first portion includes, for example, a table row or column. The one or more items displayed via the second computing device include, for example, a visualization based on data associated with the first portion.