Cross-Encoder Transformer Pre-Training With Semi-Supervised Signals
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
The initial pre-training stages of machine learning models, particularly in general-purpose language modeling, are computationally expensive and resource-intensive due to the need for massive amounts of data, including both self-supervised and supervised data, which are not optimally combined to enhance model performance for downstream tasks.
Innovation Solution
A semi-supervised pre-training architecture that combines self-supervised and supervised tasks using a cross-encoder transformer model, leveraging proprietary metadata and industry-specific data to improve model performance and accuracy for specific domains, such as retail and medical environments.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If massive amounts of self-supervised and supervised data are used for pre-training, then model performance for downstream tasks is improved, but computational cost and resource consumption increase significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The training process is segmented into two distinct stages: a pre-training stage using self-supervised learning on large unlabeled datasets, and a fine-tuning stage using supervised learning on smaller labeled datasets. This segmentation allows the model to first learn general patterns from abundant data efficiently, then specialize on specific tasks with smaller computational resources, thereby reducing overall computational cost while maintaining performance.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs preliminary self-supervised pre-training on large datasets before the actual fine-tuning on labeled data. This preliminary action establishes a robust foundational model that captures general language patterns and domain knowledge, which then enables more efficient and accurate fine-tuning on specific downstream tasks with significantly reduced computational requirements.
2Adaptability or versatility
If self-supervised data is used for pre-training, then model general knowledge is improved, but accuracy for domain-specific tasks decreases without proper fine-tuning
Solution Approach 1:
The training process is divided into pre-training on general self-supervised data to build broad knowledge, followed by fine-tuning on domain-specific labeled data to achieve task accuracy. This segmentation ensures the model first acquires general capabilities and then specializes in domain-specific tasks with targeted precision.
Solution Approach 2:
The fine-tuning stage applies local quality by adapting the pre-trained model's general knowledge to specific domain requirements using domain-specific labeled data. This allows the model to maintain its general capabilities while developing specialized accuracy for particular tasks such as medical or legal processing.
3Reliability
If human-annotated supervised data is used for fine-tuning, then task-specific performance is improved, but data collection cost and time increase
Solution Approach 1:
The approach segments data usage into a large pre-training phase that does not require human annotation, followed by a smaller fine-tuning phase that uses human-annotated data. This segmentation dramatically reduces the amount of time and resources needed for data collection, as only a fraction of the total data requires expensive human annotation.
Solution Approach 2:
The pre-training stage uses self-supervised learning where the model generates its own training data and labels automatically from unlabeled datasets. This self-service approach eliminates the need for time-consuming human annotation for the bulk of the training data, significantly reducing data collection time and costs.
4Adaptability or versatility
If a transformer model architecture is used, then language modeling capability is improved, but computational resource requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The computational resource requirements are segmented across two training stages with different resource profiles. The pre-training stage uses high computational resources for a limited duration to establish the foundational transformer model, while the fine-tuning stage uses lower computational resources for extended periods to adapt to specific tasks, thereby managing overall resource consumption.
Solution Approach 2:
The transformer model performs preliminary self-supervised pre-training to establish its language modeling capabilities and internal representations. This preliminary action creates a foundation that can be efficiently fine-tuned for specific tasks with reduced computational resources, as the heavy lifting of learning general language patterns is already complete.
Data Source
AI summary
Systems, apparatus, articles of manufacture, and methods are disclosed to train a machine learning model using semi-supervised signals. An example apparatus disclosed herein comprises interface circuitry, machine-readable instructions, and at least one processor circuit to be programmed by the machine-readable instructions to tokenize a first input and a second input to generate first tokens and second tokens, generate context information based on transformer self-attention layer interaction between the first tokens and the second tokens, the self attention layer interaction to generate numerical values for respective ones of the first tokens and the second tokens, insert a first average value of the first tokens to a first group classifier model to predict a first group classification, insert a second average value of the second tokens to a second group classifier model to predict a second group classification, the first and second group classifier models trained with supervised data associated with the first and second inputs, insert masked ones of the first tokens and second tokens to a masked language model, and train a transformer based on an average loss value associated with (a) a first loss value corresponding to the first group classification, (b) a second loss value corresponding to the second group classification, (c) a third loss value corresponding to the MLM, and (d) a fourth loss value corresponding to an object matching neural network.


