Cross-flow Tray Segmentation for Liquid Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-capacity cross-flow trays face issues with uniform liquid distribution and recirculation of liquid, leading to reduced separation efficiency and undesirable entrainment at low liquid flow rates.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a weir system and splash walls to direct liquid flow uniformly across the tray deck, with discharge openings positioned predominantly downstream to prevent recirculation, ensuring liquid is carried over the weir and distributed sequentially to cans, promoting plug flow and reducing entrainment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If liquid is uniformly distributed to each can, then high flow capacity is achieved, but at low liquid flow rates the liquid becomes readily entrained in the vapor stream forming spray which diminishes separation efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow capacityVSAvoidseparation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The tray deck is divided into multiple zones with sequential liquid delivery paths, and cans are grouped within zones. Liquid is segmented to be delivered to specific groups of cans in sequence rather than uniformly to all cans simultaneously, allowing control over liquid distribution patterns to prevent entrainment while maintaining flow capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the tray deck are assigned different functions: inlet areas for liquid introduction, active areas with cans for vapor-liquid interaction, and outlet areas for liquid removal. The liquid distribution is locally optimized in each zone to achieve appropriate liquid loading on cans without excessive uniform distribution that causes entrainment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If liquid flows directly from inlet to downcomer, then simple flow path is achieved, but liquid tends to be recirculated to each can rather than flowing in desired plug flow pattern across the tray

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow path complexityVSAvoidplug flow pattern
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The tray deck is segmented into multiple zones separated by outlet areas and downcomers. Liquid flow is divided into sequential segments that progress through each zone in order, preventing direct short-circuiting from inlet to downcomer and ensuring plug flow pattern through proper zonal progression

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Outlet areas and intermediate downcomers act as mediators between inlet areas and final outlet regions. These intermediary structures control liquid progression through the tray, forcing liquid to flow sequentially through each zone rather than allowing direct recirculation paths

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If discharge openings are positioned on all sides of cans, then liquid can exit freely, but liquid exits may be recirculated back to the same cans reducing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliquid exit freedomVSAvoidseparation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Discharge openings in the can walls are positioned asymmetrically, predominantly on the downstream side of each can rather than uniformly distributed around the circumference. This asymmetric positioning directs liquid discharge away from upstream cans, preventing recirculation while maintaining adequate liquid exit capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of positioning discharge openings to maximize liquid exit freedom in all directions, the design inverts the approach by strategically positioning openings predominantly downstream to prioritize prevention of recirculation, accepting slightly restricted exit freedom in exchange for improved separation efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances mass transfer and heat exchange efficiency by ensuring uniform liquid distribution and minimizing recirculation, thereby improving separation efficiency across the tray deck.

Implementation Method 1

A weir is positioned between a first group of cans in a first zone on the tray deck and a second group of cans in a second zone on the tray deck to cause liquid to be delivered to the cans in the first group of cans before being delivered to the second group of cans

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity-driven flow: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

The discharge openings are also positioned predominantly or entirely on a downstream side of the cans so that liquid exiting through the discharge openings is carried over the weir and onto the tray deck in the second zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity-driven flow: Gravitation

Implementation Method 3

A plurality of vapor openings positioned in the tray deck allows the upward passage of vapor through the tray deck

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy-driven flow: Gravitation

Implementation Method 4

The trays include a deck surface in which a plurality of openings are provided to allow an ascending fluid stream, typically a vapor stream, to pass through the tray deck and interact with a liquid stream flowing horizontally across the deck surface. The vapor-liquid interaction that occurs on this active area of the deck surface forms a froth that facilitates the desired mass transfer and/or heat exchange between the liquid and vapor streams

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 5

A swirling motion is imparted to vapor ascending within the can using swirl vanes positioned within the cans

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentEP2337615B1Cross-flow tray and method employing same
Publication Date: 2016.12.14 KOCH GLITSCH INC
  • EP2337615B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2337615B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2337615B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A cross-flow tray is provided with a tray deck and groupings of cans separated by weirs. The cans have walls that surround vapor openings in the tray deck. Openings are provided in the walls to allow liquid to enter the cans from the tray deck. Additional openings are provided in the walls to allow liquid to exit the cans. Swirlers positioned within the cans induce a centrifugal swirling motion to the vapor and liquid to facilitate mass transfer and/or heat exchange between the vapor and liquid within the cans.