Cross-Gate Lever Control for Multi-Circuit Hydraulic Implement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural tractors with attached implements like front loaders require multiple hydraulic circuits and additional buttons for controlling complex functions, leading to increased cost, space requirements, and driver confusion due to the need for multiple joysticks and buttons for programmed functions.

Innovation Solution

A single vehicle control means with two modes of operation, allowing manual control of hydraulic circuits and automated functions, using a cross-gate lever with selector buttons to manage fluid flow independently through multiple hydraulic circuits, reducing the need for additional joysticks and buttons.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If additional buttons are fitted to the joystick to control programmed functions, then control capability is improved, but space on the lever is reduced and driver confusion increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol capabilityVSAvoiddriver confusion
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The existing joystick buttons are made multi-functional through programmability. The control unit allows buttons to be assigned different functions based on operational mode, enabling the same physical button to control different programmed functions without requiring additional buttons for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The button functions are made dynamic and changeable through software programming rather than being fixed. The control unit stores multiple function assignments and switches between them based on the selected operational mode, allowing the interface to adapt to different operational requirements without physical modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If a further joystick is fitted to control programmed functions, then control capability is improved, but cost and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol capabilityVSAvoidspace and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The existing joystick is made universal by programming it to control both standard hydraulic circuits and additional programmed functions. The control unit processes commands from the same joystick regardless of which function is active, eliminating the need for a separate control device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control functions for standard hydraulic circuits and programmed functions are merged into a single joystick interface. The control unit combines the control signals and routing logic to manage all functions through one unified control mechanism, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple hydraulic circuits are controlled independently, then functional versatility is improved, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional versatilityVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit acts as an intermediary between the joystick and multiple hydraulic circuits. It receives single commands from the joystick and intelligently routes them to the appropriate hydraulic circuit based on the selected operational mode and current system state, simplifying the control interface while maintaining independent circuit control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is segmented into independent operational modes, each managing specific hydraulic circuits. The control unit can switch between different mode configurations, allowing complex multi-circuit control to be broken down into manageable, context-specific control segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2557238B1Control means for controlling an implement attached to a vehicle
Publication Date: 2018.07.18 AGCO INT GMBH
  • EP2557238B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2557238B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2557238B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A vehicle control means (10) for controlling movement of an implement (2) attached to the vehicle (1) having a first hydraulic circuit for moving the implement (2) or a tool (6) attached to the implement (2), a second hydraulic circuit for moving the tool (6) or the implement (2) and at least one further hydraulic circuit for moving an additional consumer relating to the tool (6) or implement (2). The control means (10) comprises a lever (11) having a first and a second axis of operation (A,B) wherein in a first mode of operation the first and the second axes of operation (A,B) control manual movement of the first, second and the at least one further hydraulic ircuits and wherein in a second mode of operation the first and second axes of operation control programmed functions associated with the first and second hydraulic circuits.