Cross-Genre Recommendation System Using Complementary Store Prioritization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional recommendation systems fail to effectively recommend stores or content across multiple genres, such as restaurants and hotels, to users, leading to limited user satisfaction and potential loss of business opportunities by recommending competing stores.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that obtains user preference information across multiple genres and determines recommendation items by analyzing user identification, location, and relationship information to prioritize complementary store recommendations, reducing the frequency of competitive store recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If recommendation systems recommend stores across multiple genres, then user satisfaction and business opportunities increase, but the risk of recommending competing stores increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecross-genre recommendation capabilityVSAvoidrecommendation of competing stores
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments stores by genre (restaurants, hotels, etc.) and analyzes user preferences within each genre separately. The recommendation system divides the recommendation process into genre-specific evaluations, allowing it to recommend across genres while maintaining awareness of competitive relationships within each genre category.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces relationship information as an intermediary factor that mediates between user preferences and store recommendations. This relationship information indicates competitive or complementary relationships between stores, allowing the system to filter out harmful competitive recommendations while preserving beneficial cross-genre recommendations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If conventional recommendation systems recommend competing stores, then user may find alternatives, but business opportunities for target stores are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoidloss of business opportunities
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts potentially harmful competitive store recommendations into beneficial complementary store recommendations by utilizing relationship information. Instead of simply excluding competing stores, the system uses relationship data to identify and prioritize complementary stores, turning a negative outcome into a positive business opportunity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If detailed adjustments are made in conventional recommendation methods to avoid competing stores, then harmful recommendations are reduced, but operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency of competing store recommendationsVSAvoidadjustment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the recommendation system to automatically adjust its behavior by incorporating relationship information into the recommendation algorithm. The system self-regulates by using the relationship data to automatically filter competitive stores and prioritize complementary ones, eliminating the need for manual detailed adjustments while maintaining low operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10754906B2Information processing apparatus, information processing system, information processing method, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2020.08.25 KK TOSHIBA
  • US10754906B2 patent drawing
  • US10754906B2 patent drawing
  • US10754906B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, an information processing apparatus includes a preference information obtainer that obtains preference information indicating preferences of a target user to which recommendation is to be made, the preferences ranging over a plurality of genres. The information processing apparatus includes a recommendation item determiner that determines, using the preference information of the target user and recommendation candidate information about a plurality of recommendation candidates ranging over a plurality of genres, a recommendation item to be recommended to the target user from the plurality of recommendation candidates, the recommendation candidate information being stored in an accessible storage apparatus.