Cross-lingual Event Encoder Using Homographic Augmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Natural language documents describe events in diverse ways across different languages, making it challenging to extract and unify events for searchability and repository creation, especially due to the sparsity of labeled data and differences in linguistic expressions.

Innovation Solution

The development of neural networks that leverage homographic augmentation and rich linguistic features, such as semantic and syntactic information, to train event encoders and extraction engines across multiple languages, enabling the generation of additional text documents associated with events and subsequent event extraction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If neural networks are trained using only existing labeled data, then training is simple, but extraction accuracy is low due to data sparsity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction accuracyVSAvoidlabeled data quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by using parsers to generate additional labeled training data before the actual event extraction task. The event encoder is first trained on existing labeled data to generate synthetic labeled documents, which then serve as expanded training material for improving extraction accuracy without requiring more manual annotations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of existing labeled data by using the event encoder to generate additional natural language text documents associated with events. These synthesized documents replicate the structure and linguistic patterns of original data while providing diverse expressions of the same events, effectively multiplying the training data available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If event extraction is performed across multiple languages, then cross-lingual coverage is improved, but complexity of handling linguistic differences increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecross-lingual coverageVSAvoidlinguistic processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements universality by creating a multi-lingual event encoder that can process documents in two or more natural languages through a single unified model. The encoder leverages parsers in each language while maintaining a common event representation space, allowing one system to handle multiple languages without requiring separate extraction models for each language.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parsers as intermediaries between the raw multilingual text and the event extraction process. Each language has its own parser that handles language-specific linguistic structures, translating diverse linguistic expressions into a unified representation that the event encoder can process uniformly across all languages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If parsers are integrated into the event extraction system, then linguistic feature extraction is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelinguistic feature extraction accuracyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the parser and event encoder into an integrated architecture where the parser's linguistic analysis directly feeds into the event encoder. This combination allows the event encoder to leverage parsed linguistic features (such as part-of-speech tags, dependency relations, and syntactic structures) without requiring separate processing stages, reducing overall system complexity while improving feature extraction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12079586B2Linguistically rich cross-lingual text event embeddings
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 RTX BBN TECH INC
  • US12079586B2 patent drawing
  • US12079586B2 patent drawing
  • US12079586B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A machine accesses a preexisting set of natural language text documents in multiple natural languages. Each natural language text document in at least a portion of the preexisting set is associated with an event. The machine trains, using the preexisting set of natural language text documents and the associated events, an event encoder to learn associations between texts and event annotations. The event encoder leverages a parser in each of the two or more natural languages. The machine generates, using the event encoder, new event annotations for texts. The machine trains, using the preexisting set of natural language text documents and the new event annotations for the texts generated by the event encoder, an event extraction engine to extract events from natural language texts in the two or more natural languages. The event extraction engine leverages the parser in each of the two or more natural languages.