Cross-Lingual Multimedia Indexing With Neural Query Reranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing search systems have not fully leveraged advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning to optimize indexing and ranking of multi-media and multi-lingual data, leading to suboptimal search results.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic indexing approach using multiple indexing algorithms and a trained neural network to generate indexes of varying granularities, combined with a query router, reranker, and calibration logic to enhance search accuracy, including feedback mechanisms for continuous improvement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional indexing methods are used, then system complexity is low, but search accuracy and relevance are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the search process into multiple independent modules: initial query processing, re-ranking stage, and calibration stage. Each module handles specific aspects of search optimization, allowing complex AI/ML techniques to be applied selectively rather than uniformly across the entire system, thus improving search accuracy while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the granularity of indexing based on query characteristics and uses trained neural networks to determine optimal indexing strategies. The re-ranking and calibration logic adaptively processes results based on initial query outcomes, enabling the system to optimize search accuracy for different query types and contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If multiple indexing algorithms are used, then search coverage and accuracy improve, but computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies multiple indexing algorithms selectively rather than uniformly. The query routing logic determines which indexed sets to apply based on query characteristics, and the re-ranking logic applies computational complex approaches only to a limited subset of initial results rather than the entire result set, reducing overall computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The initial search results serve as an intermediary between the simple query logic and the computationally complex re-ranking logic. This two-stage approach allows the system to use resource-efficient initial indexing for broad coverage while reserving computationally intensive algorithms for refining a smaller subset of results, optimizing the balance between accuracy and resource usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If computational complex approaches are used for re-ranking, then result relevance improves, but processing speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresult relevanceVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The re-ranking logic applies computational complex approaches only to a limited subset of initial search results rather than processing the entire result set. This selective application maintains high result relevance for the most promising candidates while minimizing the impact on overall processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The initial query processing stage performs preliminary filtering and indexing using simpler, faster algorithms to generate an initial result set. This preliminary action reduces the volume of data that requires computationally intensive re-ranking, thereby improving overall processing speed while still achieving high result relevance in the final output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic indexing with neural networks is implemented, then adaptability to user behavior improves, but system complexity and training requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to user behaviorVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments adaptability into modular components: query routing logic that adapts to query characteristics, re-ranking logic that learns from user feedback, and calibration logic that adjusts based on performance metrics. This modular approach enables targeted adaptation to user behavior without requiring complete system reconfiguration, managing complexity while improving versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the re-ranking logic is trained and optimized based on user interactions and query outcomes. This feedback loop enables the system to continuously adapt to user behavior patterns, improving versatility while the modular architecture keeps complexity manageable through focused learning objectives in each module.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12554782B2Self-improving system for searching cross-lingual and multi-media data
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 VECTARA INC
  • US12554782B2 patent drawing
  • US12554782B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A dynamic approach to indexing of content that allows a trained neural network to determine the graduality of indexes and/or the types of indexes that are employed. This dynamic approach may include generation of multiple indexes on the same content using multiple indexing algorithms.