Cross-Linked CNT Electrodes on Microstructured Metal for Low Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing supercapacitors face limitations in energy density due to high contact resistance from barrier layers and loose structures of carbon nanotubes, as well as poor power density from binder-induced resistance and resistive charge transfer across parallel nanotubes.

Innovation Solution

Direct growth of cross-linked carbon nanotubes on a microstructured metal substrate without a binder or barrier layer, using metal nanoparticles as catalysts via atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition, creating a highly dense and interconnected structure for improved conductivity and surface area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a barrier layer (Al2O3 or SiO2) is used to support CNTs layer, then the CNTs layer can be synthesized on the substrate, but the contact resistance between the CNTs layer and the current collector increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact resistanceVSAvoidbarrier layer structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the barrier layer (Al2O3 or SiO2) from the substrate structure, allowing CNTs to grow directly on the metal current collector. This extraction of the barrier layer eliminates the contact resistance issue while maintaining the CNTs layer synthesis capability through direct catalytic growth on the metal surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs asymmetric structure design where CNTs are grown vertically on one side of the metal substrate with a specific orientation, creating a unidirectional growth pattern that optimizes electron transport from the substrate through the CNTs to the electrolyte interface, rather than using symmetric barrier layers on both sides.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Ease of manufacture

If CNTs are grown perpendicular to the substrate in a loose structure, then the CNTs layer can be formed easily, but the mass density decreases which is not beneficial for energy density improvement

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCNTs layer formationVSAvoidmass density
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a two-dimensional loose CNT mat structure to a three-dimensional vertically aligned forest structure grown directly on the substrate. This dimensional change allows the CNTs to stand upright with controlled density, maximizing the active material quantity per unit area while maintaining ease of formation through CVD processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes growth parameters (temperature, pressure, gas flow, catalyst composition) to control the density and orientation of vertically aligned CNTs. By adjusting these parameters, the CNTs achieve optimal mass density for energy storage while maintaining the vertical growth morphology that facilitates charge transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If binder is used to hold the CNTs layer on the current collector, then the CNTs layer can be attached to the substrate, but the contact resistance increases and power density is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadhesionVSAvoidcontact resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent completely removes the binder material from the electrode structure, allowing CNTs to adhere directly to the metal current collector through van der Waals forces and mechanical interlocking. This extraction eliminates the binder-induced contact resistance while maintaining sufficient adhesion for electrode integrity during assembly and operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Device complexity

If parallel CNTs structure is used, then the electrode can be formed with simple structure, but the charge transfer resistance is higher compared to interconnected CNTs

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestructureVSAvoidcharge transfer resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple parallel CNTs into an interconnected network structure where CNTs are joined at junctions, forming a three-dimensional conductive pathway. This merging of individual CNTs creates multiple parallel electron transport routes, reducing charge transfer resistance while maintaining structural simplicity through direct growth on the substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in supercapacitors with high capacitance and low equivalent series resistance, enabling enhanced energy and power density, as well as the ability to load pseudocapacitive materials for further performance improvement.

Implementation Method 1

growing cross-linked carbon nanotubes on the microstructures in the presence of the catalysts by chemical vapor deposition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical vapor deposition: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 2

converting metal or metal compounds layer into metal nanoparticles as the catalysts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS20230274891A1Direct growth cross-linked carbon nanotubes on microstructured metal substrate for supercapacitor application
Publication Date: 2023.08.31 UNIV COLLEGE OF SOUTHEAST NORWAY
  • US20230274891A1 patent drawing
  • US20230274891A1 patent drawing
  • US20230274891A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Method as well as resulting electrode and capacitor. The method includes the following process steps: •. in a surface of a metal film substrate, etching microstructures with a predetermined roughness, •. depositing in said microstructures a metal or compound layer, •. converting said metal or compounds layer into metal nanoparticles, constituting a catalyst, •. growing cross linked nanotubes in said microstructures at said metal nanoparticle acting as catalysts.