Cross-linked Slatwall Shelving System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Metal slatwall panels in gondola shelving systems are expensive due to their thickness requirements for durability, increasing manufacturing and shipping costs, and making assembly difficult, while mixed material solutions fail to provide the necessary strength and durability.

Innovation Solution

A cross-linked slatwall system where multiple slats with holes are connected by crossing rods, allowing for incremental strengthening without increasing panel thickness or using expensive alloys, enabling versatile configurations from short to long and light to heavy-duty shelving.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If thick metal slatwall panels are used to ensure durability and strength, then structural strength is improved, but manufacturing cost and shipping weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidshipping weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The slatwall panel is divided into multiple thin metal slats that are spaced apart vertically. Each slat is individually supported by horizontal support members, distributing the structural load across multiple components rather than requiring a single thick panel. This segmentation allows thin slats (reducing weight) to work together to achieve the strength of a thick panel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines thin metal slats with horizontal support members (which may be metal or alternative materials) to create a composite structural system. The support members provide additional structural reinforcement from behind, allowing the front-facing slats to be thin and lightweight while the overall assembly maintains high strength and durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If thick metal slatwall panels are used to ensure durability, then structural strength is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the panel into multiple thin slats and support members, each component can be manufactured separately using standard, cost-effective processes. Thin metal slats are cheaper to produce than thick panels, and the modular nature allows for efficient manufacturing and assembly, reducing overall manufacturing cost while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The composite structure allows the use of inexpensive thin metal slats in the visible front portion while using support members (which can be optimized for cost and strength) in the structural support role. This separation of aesthetic and structural functions enables cost-effective manufacturing without sacrificing durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If thick metal slatwall panels are used to ensure durability, then structural strength is improved, but assembly difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidassembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The panel is segmented into multiple thin slats that can be individually handled and installed. Each slat is lightweight and easy to position, and the modular design with standardized support members allows for simple assembly procedures. Workers can install slats one at a time rather than maneuvering large, heavy thick panels, significantly reducing assembly difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The composite construction with thin slats and support members creates a system where components are lightweight and easy to assemble. The support members provide structural framework that guides slat installation, making the assembly process straightforward and reducing the need for heavy equipment or specialized assembly procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Ease of manufacture

If thin metal sheets are folded to create slatwall panels, then material cost is reduced, but structural support capability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial costVSAvoidstructural support capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Thin metal sheets are cut into multiple narrow slats rather than forming a single thick panel. These slats are spaced apart and individually supported by horizontal support members. The segmentation allows thin material to be used while the support members provide the necessary structural reinforcement, achieving both cost reduction and adequate support capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses thin metal slats (cost-effective material) combined with horizontal support members to create a composite structure. The support members compensate for the reduced thickness of the slats, providing the structural support capability that would otherwise require thick panels. This composite approach maintains structural integrity while using thinner, cheaper materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS20250009145A1Cross-linked Slatwall Shelving System
Publication Date: 2025.01.09 KANG SAEYOUNG
  • US20250009145A1 patent drawing
  • US20250009145A1 patent drawing
  • US20250009145A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A cross-linked slatwall shelving system where a plurality of back panels, each having four or more holes penetrating vertically through the entirety of the panels; and two or more rods, each connecting two or more panels by penetrating the holes; wherein one or more panels are penetrated by two different rods that penetrate two different sets of panels forming one or more cross-links. Cross-links reinforce the structural integrity and rigidity of the back panel of a shelving system.