Cross-Panel Object Linking for Multi-Touch Displays

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing information processing apparatuses with multiple touch panels cannot link and control display of objects between panels, limiting their ability to perform integrated processing of touch operations.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus with a controller that links and changes displayed objects between touch panels based on user touch operations, allowing for integrated processing and increased flexibility by recognizing specific touch gestures within a predetermined time period.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple touch panels are provided in the information processing apparatus, then the versatility and processing capacity are improved, but the capability to link and control display of objects between panels deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidlinking and controlling display
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the functionality of multiple touch panels by enabling cross-panel object linking. When a touch operation is detected on an object displayed on one panel, the system links and controls the display of related objects on other panels, effectively combining the operational capability across multiple panels into a unified interaction model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary that receives touch operations from one panel and translates them into coordinated display control across multiple panels. It mediates between the touch input on one panel and the display output on multiple panels, enabling seamless cross-panel object linking and control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If touch operations on multiple touch panels are detected independently, then the detection accuracy is improved, but the integrated processing capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetouch operation detectionVSAvoidintegrated processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous integrated processing by linking touch operations across panels within a predetermined time period. When a touch operation is detected on one panel, the controller continuously monitors and processes related touch operations on other panels, ensuring uninterrupted integrated processing flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller performs preliminary action by detecting and recording the first touch operation on one panel, then uses this information to anticipate and process subsequent touch operations on other panels. This preliminary detection enables the system to prepare for and execute integrated processing more efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the predetermined time period for linking touch operations is set, then the operational reliability is improved, but the flexibility in detecting operations in opposite directions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation linking accuracyVSAvoidgesture recognition flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its response based on the direction and nature of touch operations. Within the predetermined time period, the controller recognizes not only sequential operations but also operations in opposite directions, adapting its processing logic to maintain both reliability and gesture recognition flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent handles operations in opposite directions asymmetrically by recognizing that opposite-direction operations within the time period represent intentional gestures rather than errors. This asymmetric treatment allows the system to distinguish between accidental sequential touches and deliberate opposite-direction gestures, maintaining both reliability and flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS9047046B2Information processing apparatus, information processing method and program
Publication Date: 2015.06.02 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US9047046B2 patent drawing
  • US9047046B2 patent drawing
  • US9047046B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes a first touch panel, a second touch panel, and a controller. The first touch panel displays a first object and detects a first touch operation of a user on the first object. The second touch panel displays a second object and detects a second touch operation of the user on the second object. The controller links and changes the displayed first object and the displayed second object when the second touch operation is detected within a predetermined time period since the first touch operation has been detected.