Unperforated Cross-Passage Packing for Lower Pressure Drop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cross-passage packings with perforations suffer from increased pressure drop and material loss, which negatively impact mass transfer efficiency, despite intended improvements in gas exchange and pressure drop reduction.

Innovation Solution

A cross-passage packing method using unperforated metal fabric layers with corrugated or pleated structures, where the angle between crossing passages is less than 100°, and liquid loading is maintained at a low level (L/a < 10 l/m²h), forming a self-wetting carrier for the liquid stream.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If perforations are added to metal fabric packings to improve gas exchange, then gas exchange is improved, but pressure drop increases and material surface is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas exchangeVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the harmful element (perforations) from the system. By removing perforations from the metal fabric packing, the patent eliminates the source of pressure drop increase and material surface loss, while maintaining gas exchange functionality through the intact fabric structure and liquid film formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the operational parameters, specifically maintaining liquid loading below 10 l/m²h. This parameter change enables the unperforated fabric to function effectively as a mass transfer surface without the need for perforations, thereby reducing pressure drop while maintaining gas exchange capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stress or pressure

If perforations are added to metal fabric packings to reduce pressure drop, then pressure drop is reduced, but material surface is lost and mass transfer efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure dropVSAvoidmass transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention inverts the conventional approach by using unperforated fabric instead of perforated fabric. Counterintuitively, this reversal eliminates pressure drop while maintaining or improving mass transfer efficiency, as the intact fabric provides continuous liquid film formation and larger effective surface area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

By changing the liquid loading parameter to remain below 10 l/m²h, the invention enables the unperforated fabric to operate in an optimal regime where capillary wicking and liquid film formation provide efficient mass transfer without requiring perforations, thus maintaining productivity while reducing pressure drop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stress or pressure

If unperforated metal fabric is used, then pressure drop is reduced, but liquid distribution may be insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure dropVSAvoidliquid distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The unperforated metal fabric serves itself by utilizing capillary forces and surface tension to automatically distribute and retain the liquid film across its surface. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for external liquid distribution systems or perforations, achieving both low pressure drop and adequate liquid distribution simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a significantly smaller pressure drop and improved mass transfer characteristics, with the unperforated fabric packing demonstrating a 20% reduction in pressure loss compared to perforated designs, while maintaining equivalent separation efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

Since the metal fabrics form 'self-wetting' carriers of the liquid stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelf-wetting: Wetting

Implementation Method 2

the metal fabric forms a carrier for the liquid stream which is unperforated, i.e. largely free of perforations or other openings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Implementation Method 3

The fabric packing is composed of vertical layers that consist of corrugated or pleated metal fabrics that form flow passages

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow passage formation:

Implementation Method 4

an exchange of material and/or heat is carried out between a liquid stream and a stream of gas or vapor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMass transfer: Diffusion

Implementation Method 5

which takes place at a phase interface between a descending liquid film on the packing surface and a gas stream flowing through the passages

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase interface exchange:

Data Source

PatentUS7434794B2Mass transfer method using static packings
Publication Date: 2008.10.14 SULZER MANAGEMENT AG
  • US7434794B2 patent drawing
  • US7434794B2 patent drawing
  • US7434794B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The use of a cross-passage packing made of a metal fabric relates to a method in which an exchange of material and/or of heat is carried out between a liquid stream and a gas or vapour stream. The fabric packing (1) used is composed of vertical layers (11′, 12′) which consist of corrugated or pleated metal fabrics (11, 12) which form flow passages (13). The gas or vapour stream flows in the flow passages and the liquid stream flows on the metal fabric. The flow passages of adjacent layers cross in an open manner. The angle between crossing passages is lower than approximately 100°. In this method, the fabric packing is acted on by a relatively small liquid loading. The metal fabric forms a carrier for the liquid stream that is largely free of holes or other apertures. Values for the liquid loading are selected in accordance with the relationship L/a&lt;10 l/mh, where L is the specific surface loading in volume units of the liquid per surface unit of the packing cross-section, and a is the specific surface which the metal fabric spans.