Cross-Point Anti-Fuse OTP Memory with MIS Capacitors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cross-point anti-fuse one-time programmable (OTP) memories face challenges such as significant process complexity, array leakage current, and reliability issues, while also requiring additional process steps and masks, which are not compatible with standard CMOS flows, and suffer from program disturb and gate dielectric breakdown.

Innovation Solution

A cross-point anti-fuse OTP memory design that uses Metal-Insulator-Semiconductor (MIS) capacitors with no source/drain implants connected to the channel, following a standard CMOS process flow, with optional floating p+ regions and thicker gate dielectrics to reduce leakage and improve reliability, and employs a bitline implant mask to form active stripes without additional critical masks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If cross-point anti-fuse OTP memory is implemented with source/drain implants connected to the channel, then programming capability is achieved, but program disturb and gate dielectric breakdown occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogram reliabilityVSAvoidprogram disturb and gate dielectric breakdown
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the source/drain implant regions from the memory cell structure. By eliminating these implants entirely, the patent prevents program disturb and gate dielectric breakdown while maintaining the anti-fuse programming mechanism through direct gate dielectric breakdown without requiring connected source/drain regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using source/drain implants to enable programming (conventional approach), the patent inverts the approach by using direct gate dielectric breakdown without source/drain connections. This inversion eliminates the harmful effects of source/drain regions while achieving the desired programming functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Reliability

If additional process steps and masks are added to achieve cross-point anti-fuse memory, then memory functionality is achieved, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory functionalityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses standard CMOS process steps that serve multiple functions. The same process steps used for creating standard CMOS devices are also used for creating the anti-fuse memory cells, eliminating the need for additional specialized process steps and masks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The standard CMOS process flow automatically creates the necessary structures for anti-fuse memory without requiring additional process steps. The existing process capabilities are leveraged to self-create the memory functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If source and drain regions extend under sidewall spacers to connect to channel region, then transistor operation is enabled, but array leakage current increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor operationVSAvoidarray leakage current
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the source/drain regions entirely from the memory cell structure. By eliminating these regions, the patent eliminates the leakage current path that would exist through extended source/drain regions under sidewall spacers, while maintaining memory functionality through the anti-fuse mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If thicker gate dielectric is used to prevent breakdown, then reliability improves, but cell area increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate dielectric reliabilityVSAvoidcell area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different dielectric thicknesses to different regions of the gate. The gate dielectric is thinner in regions where breakdown is desired for programming and thicker in regions where leakage prevention is needed, optimizing both reliability and area efficiency through localized dielectric properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves a compact memory array with low leakage current and improved program reliability, maintaining logic CMOS compatibility without extra process steps or masks, and reduces cell size and program disturb issues.

Implementation Method 1

The gate dielectric before programming and the P+/N+ diode formed after programming can have questionable quality

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGate dielectric breakdown: Avalanche Breakdown

Implementation Method 2

Due to impact ionization and other high voltage mechanisms, the floating source/drain can be charged up to a voltage well above ground

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact ionization: Electron Avalanche

Data Source

PatentUS8330189B2One-time programmable memory and method for making the same
Publication Date: 2012.12.11 SYNOPSYS INC
  • US8330189B2 patent drawing
  • US8330189B2 patent drawing
  • US8330189B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A one time programmable nonvolatile memory formed from metal-insulator-semiconductor cells. The cells are at the crosspoints of conductive gate lines and intersecting doped semiconductor lines formed in a semiconductor substrate.