Cross-Publisher Ad Frequency Caps Using Causal Conversions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional advertising frequency caps are inefficient as they are set per publisher and do not account for individual user responses, leading to wasted advertising budgets and missed opportunities to target other customers.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a campaign frequency cap based on causal conversions, which involves determining the probability of advertisement viewability and user response, identifying converting users, and adjusting the frequency cap based on probabilistic distributions of campaign conversions to optimize ad presentation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If traditional per-publisher frequency caps are used, then each publisher can control ad delivery to individual users, but the same user can be targeted multiple times by different publishers leading to wasted advertising budget

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertising budget wasteVSAvoidfrequency cap system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges frequency cap control from individual publisher level to campaign level across multiple publishers. The system consolidates ad delivery data from multiple publishers and implements a unified frequency cap that tracks total impressions across all publishers for each user, preventing the same user from being over-targeted by different publishers while maintaining individual publisher autonomy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where ad delivery data is collected from multiple publishers, processed to determine cumulative impression counts per user, and used to dynamically adjust frequency cap decisions. The system continuously monitors and responds to user exposure patterns across the publisher network, adjusting cap enforcement based on real-time data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If traditional per-publisher frequency caps are used, then publishers have control over their own ad delivery, but advertising budget is wasted on users who have already been sufficiently targeted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertising campaign effectivenessVSAvoiduser response data utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system collects and processes user response data from ad deliveries across multiple publishers, using this feedback to optimize frequency cap settings. By analyzing user responses (such as conversions, clicks, or engagement metrics), the system determines the optimal number of impressions needed and adjusts frequency caps accordingly, preventing waste on users who have already responded or been sufficiently exposed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The frequency cap system transitions from static, predetermined limits to dynamic, adaptive caps that adjust based on user behavior and campaign performance. The system continuously learns from user responses and modifies frequency cap parameters in real-time, optimizing the balance between user exposure and campaign effectiveness rather than applying fixed rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Quantity of substance

If higher frequency caps are set to reach more users, then more users can be targeted, but the same users are targeted too many times leading to diminishing returns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of users targetedVSAvoidadvertising budget efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic frequency caps that adapt to individual user characteristics and campaign performance. Rather than applying a uniform cap to all users, the system adjusts caps based on user response patterns, allowing higher caps for users who haven't responded and lower caps for users showing signs of saturation, thereby maximizing the number of effective impressions while minimizing waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies differentiated frequency cap strategies to different user segments based on their response characteristics. Instead of a one-size-fits-all approach, the system tailors cap levels to local user conditions, providing higher exposure limits to users who need more impressions to convert and lower limits to users who respond quickly or show diminishing returns, optimizing both reach and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12387240B2Methods, systems, and media for setting and using an advertisement frequency cap based on causal conversions
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 INTEGRAL AD SCIENCE INC
  • US12387240B2 patent drawing
  • US12387240B2 patent drawing
  • US12387240B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with some embodiments of the disclosed subject matter, methods, systems, and media for setting and using an advertisement frequency cap based on causal conversions or impact of advertisements are provided.