Cross-Species Mutant Polypeptide Screening for Subtle Activity Shifts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for protein evolution, such as site-directed mutagenesis and molecular evolution, struggle to accurately measure subtle performance changes in proteins, especially when sensitive assays are lacking, leading to inefficiencies in screening and cloning due to the rapid increase in combinations of mutations.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the generation and screening of mutant polypeptides across species, utilizing comprehensive mutagenesis and sequencing to identify cross-species active mutants, creating a functional map to optimize protein properties like binding affinity and immunogenicity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If single point mutations are generated and screened to improve protein characteristics, then beneficial amino acid substitutions can be identified, but the method requires accurate measurement of subtle performance changes which is not possible when sensitive assays do not exist

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement of subtle performance changesVSAvoiddetection of subtle performance changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses an intermediary orthologous target from a different species as a mediator to amplify and make detectable the subtle performance changes of single point mutants. By testing mutant proteins against orthologous targets, the assay sensitivity is enhanced, enabling detection of subtle binding affinity changes that would be undetectable in the original system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the direct mechanical/biochemical interaction assay (which lacks sensitivity) with a substituted assay system using orthologous proteins. This substitution allows indirect measurement of protein performance through cross-species binding interactions, which are more readily detectable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If simultaneous mutations of several sites are performed to accelerate evolution, then the number of combinations increases quickly, but this reaches the limits of cloning efficiency and screening capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevolution rateVSAvoidnumber of combinations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the protein evolution process into two distinct phases: first generating and screening single point mutants to identify beneficial substitutions, then recombining these validated mutations in subsequent rounds. This segmentation prevents the combinatorial explosion problem by limiting each screening round to manageable mutation numbers while still achieving multi-site optimization over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary screening of single point mutations before combining them into multi-mutant constructs. This preliminary action identifies which individual mutations are beneficial, allowing subsequent combinations to be rationally designed rather than randomly generated, thus reducing the effective search space and maintaining cloning/screening feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If comprehensive screening of mutant libraries is performed to identify upmutants, then improved protein characteristics can be achieved, but the process requires large numbers of clones to be screened which exceeds screening capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification of upmutantsVSAvoidscreening capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by screening only single point mutants in the first round rather than all possible mutations. This partial screening approach identifies the most promising individual mutations, which are then combined in subsequent rounds. The excessive action comes in the form of generating sufficient single mutants to ensure coverage of all possible beneficial substitutions, even if this means creating more clones than can be screened in a single round.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12631650B2Proteins targeting orthologs
Publication Date: 2026.05.19 BIOATLA LLC
  • US12631650B2 patent drawing
  • US12631650B2 patent drawing
  • US12631650B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is relevant to polypeptides and novel methods of polypeptide evolution. The present invention further relates to methods of identifying a cross-species mutant polypeptide from, or based upon, a template polypeptide.