Cross-System Award Tracking Through Unique Action Identifiers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face challenges in efficiently tracking and applying awards across multiple systems or services, especially when intermediary systems are third-party services, leading to difficulties in accessing relevant data and errors in award calculations and cancellations.

Innovation Solution

The use of unique action identifiers that are specific to each action, generated based on action and user data, allows for centralized award tracking and management, ensuring accurate application and cancellation of awards by linking relevant data across systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple systems or services are used to track awards, then award tracking coverage is improved, but system complexity and difficulty of accessing relevant data increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaward tracking coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a unique action identifier as an intermediary element that connects multiple systems and services. This identifier serves as a universal key that can be recognized and processed across different platforms, eliminating the need for complex inter-system communication protocols and data mapping mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The unique action identifier is designed to serve multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as a tracking key, a data lookup key, a cancellation reference, and an audit trail element. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate systems needed and simplifies the overall architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If unique action identifiers are used to track awards, then accuracy of award application is improved, but data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of award applicationVSAvoiddata processing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates and stores the unique action identifier at the time of the action occurrence, before any award calculation or application takes place. This preliminary creation of the identifier ensures that all subsequent processing refers to a pre-established, consistent key, eliminating the need for complex real-time data correlation and reducing processing overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If centralized award tracking is implemented, then error reduction is improved, but initial system setup complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror reductionVSAvoidinitial system setup complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the award tracking functionality into independent, modular components: identifier generation, identifier storage, award calculation, and award application. Each component operates independently and communicates through standardized interfaces using the unique action identifier, making the system easier to implement, test, and maintain despite its centralized nature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250322422A1Action specific award tracking
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 AMERICAN EXPRESS SERVICES EUROPE LTD
  • US20250322422A1 patent drawing
  • US20250322422A1 patent drawing
  • US20250322422A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are various embodiments for action specific award tracking. An award multiplier is determined based at least in part on action data. Then, a unique action identifier is generated which is associated with the award multiplier. Next, an action is initiated based at least in part on an action request which comprises the unique action identifier. Then, an award is calculated based at least in part on the unique action identifier in an action receipt. Finally, an award can be deducted based at least in part on a unique action identifier in a cancellation request.