Cross-System Data Mapping Using Similarity Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to effectively identify and manage interrelations between datasets with varying fields and formats, leading to inconsistent and unreliable manual efforts in determining data relationships.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method utilizing precision matching, concordance matching, and text analytics algorithms to generate similarity scores for data fields, creating a map that connects related data entries across disparate systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual methods are used to determine interrelations between data, then flexibility in analysis is maintained, but consistency and reliability deteriorate due to human error and inability to track changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of data relationship identificationVSAvoidautomation of data mapping process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically executing mapping operations between datasets without requiring manual intervention. The computer system retrieves data from multiple sources, applies mapping algorithms, generates similarity scores, and produces mapped datasets autonomously, eliminating human error while maintaining high reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical analysis is replaced with automated computational systems. The patent substitutes human cognitive processes with computer-based mapping operations that use algorithms to determine data relationships, ensuring consistent and reliable results through deterministic computational methods rather than variable human judgment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If comprehensive mapping of vast amounts of data is performed, then completeness of data relationships is improved, but time and computational resources worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of data relationship identificationVSAvoidtime required for data mapping
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The mapping process is segmented into distinct operational phases: retrieving data from first and second systems, performing mapping operations on specific data fields, generating similarity scores for field pairs, and producing the final mapped dataset. This segmentation enables parallel processing and optimizes computational resource utilization across the vast dataset

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-retrieving data from multiple systems and pre-processing data fields before executing the main mapping operation. Similarity scores are generated in advance for data field comparisons, and the mapping framework is prepared beforehand, reducing the time required for the actual mapping execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If multiple mapping algorithms are combined to improve accuracy, then mapping precision is improved, but system complexity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of data field matchingVSAvoidcomplexity of mapping system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple mapping algorithms are merged into a unified mapping operation. The patent combines similarity score generation, data field comparison, and relationship determination into a single integrated mapping process that operates on both datasets simultaneously, reducing system complexity while maintaining high precision through algorithmic synergy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12517929B2Mapping disparate datasets
Publication Date: 2026.01.06 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US12517929B2 patent drawing
  • US12517929B2 patent drawing
  • US12517929B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are systems and method of mapping data entries originating in different systems. A plurality of data entries from different systems are normalized such that they can be compared to each other and mapped, even though the data entries are defined by data fields with differing phrases, descriptive details, and lengths of detail. Data entries may be filtered according to data fields before a mapping operation is employed for mapping. The mapping operation evaluates similarity scores based on the data fields using a combination of exact matching algorithms, dictionary matching algorithms, and text mining algorithms. The mapped data entries and data fields are displayed to a user.