Cross-System Object Tracking via Distributed Ledger Segments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current tracking systems for physical objects are limited by reliance on centralized databases, which restrict access to product history and are vulnerable to counterfeiting, as buyers lack visibility into the product's history and access is often limited to manufacturers or intermediaries.

Innovation Solution

A cross-system object tracking platform utilizing a digital object representation with an append-only log structure that includes linked segments for each entity in the supply chain, featuring a globally unique ID, timestamps, and digital authentication certificates, allowing for decentralized tracking and verification of a product's integrity without a centralized database.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a centralized tracking database is used, then product tracking information can be stored and accessed, but access is limited to manufacturer and intermediate distributors, and the system is vulnerable to counterfeiting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking system reliabilityVSAvoidaccessibility to product history
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized database is segmented into distributed ledger entries across multiple nodes. Each node maintains a copy of the blockchain with transaction records, eliminating single-point-of-access limitations while maintaining data integrity through cryptographic linking of segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tracking database is replicated across multiple distributed nodes rather than maintained as a single centralized copy. Each participant in the supply chain holds a synchronized copy of the ledger, enabling universal access while preventing counterfeiting through cryptographic verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If a centralized tracking database is implemented, then product history can be tracked, but the system has a central point of failure and cannot scale to high volumes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking volume capacityVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the centralized database into segmented blockchain blocks distributed across multiple nodes. Each block contains a segment of transaction history and is linked cryptographically to previous blocks, enabling parallel processing and high-volume tracking without creating a single point of failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical centralized database system is replaced with a cryptographic distributed ledger system. Cryptographic hashing and digital signatures substitute for centralized authentication mechanisms, enabling scalable tracking while improving system stability through decentralized verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If security features are attached to the object, then counterfeiting resistance is improved, but the features are difficult to duplicate and require user registration and access to SCM systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecounterfeiting resistanceVSAvoidsystem setup complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Physical security features are replaced with digital cryptographic signatures and hashes that can be easily replicated and verified. The blockchain records cryptographic proofs of ownership and transfer, eliminating the need for complex physical security features while maintaining counterfeiting resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

Physical security features and manual registration systems are replaced with automated cryptographic verification. Digital signatures and blockchain consensus mechanisms automatically verify authenticity without requiring user registration or access to centralized SCM systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10963889B2Cross-system object tracking platform
Publication Date: 2021.03.30 SAP SE
  • US10963889B2 patent drawing
  • US10963889B2 patent drawing
  • US10963889B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Integrity of a physical object is verified by receiving, data encapsulating a request to verify the integrity of the physical object. Subsequently, a data structure is accessed that includes a plurality of linked segments each characterizing an entity within a supply chain for the physical object. Each segment includes a respective predecessor field and a respective hash value. All of the segments can be iterated through in reverse chronological order to confirm, for each segment, whether a value for the predecessor field is equal to a hash value in a hash field in an immediately previously segment, the hash value being a hash of all values of the particular segment. Data characterizing the iteration can then be provided. Related apparatus, systems, techniques and articles are also described.