Crossbeam-Embedded Battery Cooling for Compact EV Packs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional air cooling technology is inadequate for highly integrated power battery assemblies in new energy vehicles, leading to inefficient thermal management and reduced energy density in battery packs.

Innovation Solution

A battery cooling system featuring a crossbeam with an avoidance groove that embeds a cooling assembly, including a collecting tube and cooling tubes, to efficiently cool battery modules without occupying excessive space.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional air cooling technology is used, then the structure is simple, but the thermal management capability is insufficient for highly integrated power battery assemblies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal management capabilityVSAvoidcooling system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling assembly is nested within the avoidance groove of the crossbeam structure. The collecting tube and cooling tubes are integrated into the groove space, allowing the cooling system to be embedded within the existing structural framework rather than adding external components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling assembly is merged with the crossbeam structure by utilizing the avoidance groove. The cooling tubes are positioned within the groove and secured to the crossbeam, combining the structural support function with the thermal management function in a single integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If a liquid cooling system is added to improve thermal management, then the cooling performance increases, but the battery pack height and vehicle ground clearance are affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal management capabilityVSAvoidbattery pack height
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling assembly is arranged in the horizontal plane within the avoidance groove rather than extending vertically. The cooling tubes are positioned laterally within the groove space, transforming the cooling system from a vertical arrangement that increases pack height to a horizontal arrangement that maintains compact height while providing effective cooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling assembly is nested within the avoidance groove of the crossbeam, utilizing the existing vertical space already allocated in the structure. This nesting approach allows the cooling system to be accommodated without increasing the overall battery pack height or affecting vehicle ground clearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Reliability

If cooling tubes are added to cool battery modules, then thermal management improves, but the space for battery cells is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal management capabilityVSAvoidbattery pack energy density
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling assembly is nested within the avoidance groove, utilizing space that would otherwise be empty or structural. The cooling tubes are positioned within the groove space rather than occupying additional volume outside the structural framework, thereby maintaining maximum space for battery cells while providing effective cooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling system is merged with the existing crossbeam structure, combining thermal management functionality with the structural framework. This integration allows the cooling tubes to be positioned within the structural groove rather than requiring separate dedicated cooling space, preserving battery cell volume while achieving effective cooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances thermal management, increases energy density, and optimizes vehicle interior space and ground clearance by reducing the height of the battery pack and allowing for more flexible vehicle design.

Implementation Method 1

the cooling assembly is configured to cool the battery module

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

A battery cooling system... configured to cool the battery module

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS20250038300A1Battery cooling system, battery pack, and vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 BEIJING CHEHEJIA AUTOMOBILE TECH CO LTD
  • US20250038300A1 patent drawing
  • US20250038300A1 patent drawing
  • US20250038300A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A battery cooling system provided by the present disclosure includes a crossbeam and a cooling assembly. The crossbeam defines an avoidance groove, the avoidance groove extends in a length direction of the crossbeam, and the avoidance groove is configured to mount the cooling assembly.