Crossbow Trigger Safety Mechanism Preventing Dry Fire

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing crossbow trigger and safety mechanisms do not effectively prevent dry fire and lack innovative designs for ensuring the bowstring is only released when an arrow is properly positioned, leading to potential accidents and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A crossbow trigger assembly with a movable safety member and arrow sensing member that prevents trigger actuation when the safety is in the safe orientation and allows firing only when an arrow is present, utilizing a housing with specific components like a string catch, trigger, and arrow sensor to ensure proper alignment and operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional trigger mechanism is used without an arrow sensing system, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of preventing dry fire accidents deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of dry fire accidentsVSAvoidcomplexity of trigger and safety mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The arrow sensing member detects the presence of an arrow before the trigger can be actuated. The system performs this sensing action in advance, preventing the trigger mechanism from releasing the bowstring unless an arrow is properly positioned in the groove, thereby preventing dry fire accidents before they can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The arrow sensing member acts as an intermediary between the arrow and the trigger mechanism. It mediates the interaction by detecting arrow presence and controlling whether the trigger can be actuated, adding a safety layer without requiring complex electronic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a safety mechanism is added to prevent trigger actuation, then the safety against accidental discharge is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to additional steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety against accidental dischargeVSAvoidease of trigger actuation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The safety mechanism and trigger actuation are merged into a single integrated system. The safety member and trigger are connected such that moving the trigger automatically moves the safety member to the fire position, combining two actions into one smooth motion that maintains safety while preserving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The safety mechanism transitions from a static blocked position to a dynamic state where the safety member moves with the trigger. This dynamic connection allows the system to adapt during operation, automatically enabling firing when the trigger is pulled while maintaining safety when the trigger is at rest.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If the safety member and trigger are connected such that moving the trigger moves the safety member, then the ease of operation is improved, but the reliability of the safety mechanism deteriorates if the connection fails

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of simultaneous safety and trigger movementVSAvoidreliability of safety mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates a spring-loaded safety member that can be biased to default to the safe position. This provides a fail-safe mechanism where, in the event of connection failure, the spring force ensures the safety member returns to or remains in the safe position, preventing accidental discharge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of requiring the safety mechanism to actively enable firing, the system is designed so that the safety member defaults to blocking the trigger, and only moves out of the way when properly actuated. This inverted logic ensures that any failure in the actuation mechanism defaults to the safe state rather than the firing state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS9435605B2Safety trigger mechanism for a crossbow
Publication Date: 2016.09.06 MCP IP LLC
  • US9435605B2 patent drawing
  • US9435605B2 patent drawing
  • US9435605B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In at least one embodiment, a crossbow trigger assembly comprises a housing, a string catch and a trigger arranged to release the string catch. A safety member is moveable between safe and fire orientations, which prevents actuation of the trigger while in the safe orientation. An arrow sensing member is moveable between first and second orientations and prevents the safety member from assuming the fire orientation when the arrow sensing member is in the first orientation.