Crossed Gradient Induced Current Probe for Heat Exchanger Tube Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current nondestructive testing methods for heat exchanger tubes face limitations in defect detection speed, spatial resolution, and directional sensitivity, particularly with annular and cylindrical magnetic sensor arrays, which can misclassify cracking defects and have limitations in mass production and miniaturization due to mutual interference and complex signal processing.

Innovation Solution

A probe using a crossed gradient induced current with a multi-stage folded induction coil and arrayed magnetic sensors to generate intersecting first and second induced currents, allowing for improved defect detection by measuring amplitude and phase differences, enhancing detection speed and spatial resolution while minimizing directional bias.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If annular and cylindrical magnetic sensor arrays are used for defect detection, then detection coverage is improved, but mutual interference between sensors increases and spatial resolution deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidspatial resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The probe is divided into multiple independent detection units, each with its own induction coil and magnetic sensor. These segmented units operate independently to avoid mutual interference while collectively providing comprehensive detection coverage of the heat exchanger tube surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional arrayed sensor configurations (annular/cylindrical) to a three-dimensional probe structure where multiple detection units are arranged in space. This dimensional change allows sensors to be positioned without mutual interference while maintaining comprehensive coverage through spatial distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If complex signal processing is used to evaluate defects, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect evaluation accuracyVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The induction coil generates induced currents in predetermined directions (axial and circumferential) before defect detection. This preliminary action creates structured current patterns that naturally highlight different defect orientations, simplifying subsequent signal processing and evaluation compared to processing raw, unstructured sensor data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic sensor acts as an intermediary that converts complex electromagnetic field interactions into simplified measurement signals. By measuring magnetic field changes caused by induced currents rather than directly processing complex current distributions, the system reduces signal processing complexity while maintaining defect evaluation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If rotary probes are used to scan inner surfaces, then defect detection capability is improved, but testing speed decreases and service life shortens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidtesting speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical rotary scanning system with a stationary probe design. Instead of mechanically rotating the probe to scan inner surfaces, multiple induction coils and magnetic sensors are arranged to provide comprehensive detection coverage in fixed positions, eliminating mechanical wear and enabling continuous high-speed testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of manufacture

If bobbin-type probes are used for integrity checking, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but directional sensitivity deteriorates causing misclassification of cracking defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprobe manufacturing simplicityVSAvoiddirectional sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Different detection units within the probe have specialized configurations optimized for detecting specific defect orientations. The induction coils are arranged to generate induced currents in specific directions (axial, circumferential), giving each local detection unit enhanced sensitivity to particular defect types while maintaining overall probe manufacturing simplicity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables high-speed, quantitative defect evaluation with improved detection capabilities for both axial and circumferential cracking defects, reducing the risk of misclassification and enhancing the probe's spatial resolution and manufacturing efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

When an alternating current (AC) current is applied to a coil adjacent to the target object, an induced current occurs in the target object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

an induced current occurs in the target object. When a defect is present in a path of the induced current, a flow of the induced current is distorted

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy current: Eddy Currents

Data Source

PatentUS11169116B2Probe for nondestructive testing device using crossed gradient induced current and method for manufacturing induction coil for nondestructive testing device
Publication Date: 2021.11.09 IND ACADEMIC COOP FOUND YONSEI UNIV
  • US11169116B2 patent drawing
  • US11169116B2 patent drawing
  • US11169116B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are a probe for a nondestructive testing device using a crossed gradient induced current and a method of manufacturing an induction coil for a nondestructive testing device. The probe for a nondestructive testing device using a crossed gradient induced current includes an induction coil formed to have a predetermined width and to generate first and second induced currents in a direction crossing each other when a current is applied from a power supply, and a magnetic sensor part installed adjacent to the induction coil so as to measure the first and second induced currents induced from the induction coil.