Crossed-Loop EPR Resonator for Signal Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional EPR spectrometers face challenges in separating the EPR signal from the input microwave power, leading to noise interference and the need for low-power operation, which limits the detection of phase or dispersion components and results in signal loss during pulse-type measurements.

Innovation Solution

A crossed-loop EPR resonator assembly with orthogonally positioned ribbon resonators, one for excitation and the other for detection, allows for improved isolation of the EPR signal from the input power, reducing phase noise and enabling higher power operation without signal saturation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single resonator is used in reflection type spectrometer, then the device complexity is reduced, but the EPR signal cannot be effectively separated from the input microwave power causing noise interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresonator configurationVSAvoidnoise interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The single resonator is divided into two separate resonators: a first resonator for microwave excitation and a second resonator for signal detection. This segmentation allows the EPR signal to be isolated from the input microwave power, preventing noise interference while maintaining system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The detection function is extracted from the excitation resonator and placed in a separate second resonator. This extraction enables the EPR signal to be detected independently from the microwave source, eliminating the harmful noise that arises when both functions are combined in a single resonator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Power

If low power operation is used to avoid signal saturation, then the detector electronics are protected from saturation, but the phase noise from the microwave source becomes more significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrowave powerVSAvoidphase noise
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the excitation and detection functions into different resonators, the system can operate at higher microwave power levels in the first resonator without saturating the detector electronics in the second resonator. This segmentation removes the power limitation that previously forced low-power operation and allowed higher power to overcome phase noise issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Power

If higher power is used to improve signal detection, then the EPR signal strength increases, but the reflected microwave power causes detector saturation and noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrowave powerVSAvoiddetector saturation
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The detection function is taken out from the high-power excitation environment and placed in a separate second resonator. This allows the first resonator to operate at high power for improved signal detection while the second resonator operates at lower power levels that prevent detector saturation, effectively decoupling the power constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Object-generated harmful factors

If the resonator is critically coupled to prevent reflection, then the input power reflection is reduced, but the device complexity increases with additional coupling controls

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereflected powerVSAvoidcoupling control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The coupling system is segmented into two independent resonators with separate coupling mechanisms. The first resonator is coupled to the microwave source and the second resonator is coupled to the detector, allowing each to be independently optimized for minimal reflection without requiring complex coordinated control of a single resonator's coupling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The crossed-loop resonator design enhances signal-to-noise ratio and allows for more effective detection of EPR signals, particularly in rapid scan applications, by achieving significant isolation of phase noise and enabling higher power operation without signal saturation.

Implementation Method 1

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy are generally used to study molecular structure in chemistry, physics, biology, and medicine.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron paramagnetic resonance: Electron Paramagnetic Resonance

Implementation Method 2

A crossed-loop EPR resonator assembly with orthogonally positioned ribbon resonators, one for excitation and the other for detection, allows for improved isolation of the EPR signal from the input power

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic resonance: Resonance

Data Source

PatentEP2875369B1Crossed-loop resonators
Publication Date: 2023.10.25 UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
  • EP2875369B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2875369B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2875369B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Embodiments of the invention are directed toward a crossed-loop electron paramagnetic resonance resonator comprising a first resonator having a first resonator axis; and a second resonator having a second resonator axis. The first resonator axis and the second resonator axis can be substantially perpendicular. Either or both the first resonator and the second resonator can be a ribbon resonator having a plurality of metallic ribbons formed in a loop. Each metallic ribbon can include a central axis. The plurality of metallic ribbons can be arranged parallel relative one to another.