Cross-Flow Fan Stabilizer Geometry for Quiet Airflow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional air conditioners face challenges in maintaining flow stability and reducing broad band noise while preventing reverse inhalation and wind noise, as narrower gaps improve blowing efficiency but increase noise, and broader gaps destabilize airflow and generate backflow.

Innovation Solution

The air conditioner incorporates a cross-flow fan design with concave-convex portions on the stabilizer and casing surfaces, arranged apart in the rotational axis direction, to generate turbulences and stabilize eddies, thereby preventing reverse inhalation and reducing noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the gap between the impeller and stabilizer is narrowed to improve blowing efficiency, then the air flow stability is improved, but broad band noise increases due to collision of high-speed air with the stabilizer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblowing efficiencyVSAvoidbroad band noise
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilizer surface is segmented into multiple regions with different gap distances from the impeller. The upstream side has a larger gap while the downstream side has a smaller gap, allowing different portions to serve different functions: noise reduction upstream and flow stability downstream.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the stabilizer are given different local properties regarding gap distance. The upstream region maintains a larger gap to reduce noise, while the downstream region maintains a smaller gap to stabilize flow, optimizing performance locally in each region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the gap between the impeller and stabilizer is broadened to reduce broad band noise, then the noise is reduced, but the air flow becomes unstable and back flow is generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebroad band noiseVSAvoidair flow stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilizer is divided into upstream and downstream regions with different gap characteristics. This segmentation allows the upstream side to reduce noise while the downstream side maintains flow stability, preventing back flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gap distance is varied in the axial direction (another dimension) rather than maintaining a uniform radial gap. This creates a gradient in gap distance that simultaneously achieves noise reduction and flow stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If concave portions are formed on the rear guider to reduce interference sound, then the interference sound is reduced, but the draft resistance increases when the gap is reduced to maintain flow stability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference soundVSAvoiddraft resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilizer is segmented into upstream and downstream regions with different functions. The upstream region focuses on noise reduction while the downstream region maintains flow stability with minimal draft resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of forming concave portions that increase draft resistance, the invention uses a different approach by varying the gap distance in the axial direction, achieving noise reduction without significantly increasing draft resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design stabilizes cross-flow eddies, prevents reverse inhalation, and significantly reduces broad band and wind noise, enhancing blowing performance and user comfort.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of concave portions or convex portions which are arranged on the upstream side of the projection so as to disturb the gas stream flowing along the opposing surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentUS7517185B2Air conditioner
Publication Date: 2009.04.14 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US7517185B2 patent drawing
  • US7517185B2 patent drawing
  • US7517185B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an air conditioner, reverse inhalation is prevented while broad band noise and wind sound are reduced. A projection arranged at the leading end of a stabilizer on the downstream side of an air stream flowing along a surface of the stabilizer opposing an impeller and protrudes toward the impeller to define the shortest distance to the impeller. A plurality of grooves or projections are provided on the opposing surface on the upstream side of the projection to disturb the air stream flowing along the opposing surface. The positions of the grooves or the projections are arranged apart in a rotational axis direction. A plurality of convex portions are provided to disturb an air stream flowing along a surface of a casing opposing the impellers. The positions of the convex portions are arranged apart in the rotational axis direction of the impeller.