Crossflow heat-exchangers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large-scale electronic displays face challenges with condensation issues due to temperature and humidity fluctuations, which can lead to electronics failure and operational disruptions, particularly during startup or in cold environments, as existing heat-exchangers can contribute to condensation problems and have hot and cold spots that affect efficiency and reliability.

Innovation Solution

A crossflow heat-exchanger design with controlled fluid flow rates and temperature management systems, including impelling means and controllers, to maximize temperature differentials and prevent condensation, along with a method for operating the heat-exchanger and electronic display that involves pre-heating and dehumidification to manage dew points and humidity levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If a heat-exchanger is used to prevent overheating, then cooling efficiency is improved, but condensation problems occur during startup or in cold environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoidcondensation
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The controller activates the heat-exchanger in advance before the display is switched on, pre-heating the housing interior and raising the dew point. This preliminary action prevents condensation from forming on cold surfaces when the display starts up, while still allowing the heat-exchanger to provide cooling when needed during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the operating parameters of the heat-exchanger by controlling fluid flow rates through different channels at different rates. This optimization of temperature differentials allows the heat-exchanger to operate efficiently in both heating (pre-heating) and cooling modes, resolving the contradiction between cooling efficiency and condensation prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Temperature

If heat-exchanger operates at high efficiency, then temperature control is improved, but condensation forms in cold spots

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature controlVSAvoidcondensation in cold spots
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The controller individually controls the flow rate of fluid through each channel of the heat-exchanger, allowing different parts of the heat-exchanger to operate at different flow rates. This local control enables the system to address cold spots specifically by adjusting flow rates in those areas, preventing condensation while maintaining overall temperature control efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Temperature sensors monitor the temperature distribution across the heat-exchanger, and the controller uses this feedback information to dynamically adjust fluid flow rates through different channels. This closed-loop control ensures that cold spots are identified and corrected by increasing flow rates in those specific areas, preventing condensation formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If uniform fluid flow is used through channels, then system simplicity is maintained, but temperature differentials are reduced and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidtemperature differential
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The controller varies the flow rate parameter for fluid through different channels based on local temperature requirements. By changing the flow rate parameter dynamically rather than maintaining a uniform flow, the system maximizes temperature differentials across the heat-exchanger surfaces, significantly improving heat exchange efficiency while adding only moderate control complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces the risk of condensation, enhances heat-exchanger efficiency, and ensures reliable operation of large-scale electronic displays by maintaining optimal temperature and humidity conditions, thereby preventing electronics failure and improving overall performance.

Implementation Method 1

first and second sets of fluid-flow channels arranged such that each set crosses the other to afford heat-exchange between a first fluid in the first set and a second fluid in the second set

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

a first impelling means arranged to cause flow of the first fluid through the first set of channels; a second impelling means arranged to cause flow of the second fluid through the second set of channels

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow:

Data Source

PatentUS10905035B2Crossflow heat-exchangers
Publication Date: 2021.01.26 AMSCREEN GROUP
  • US10905035B2 patent drawing
  • US10905035B2 patent drawing
  • US10905035B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A crossflow heat-exchanger has first and second sets of fluid-flow channels arranged such that each set crosses the other to afford heat-exchange between cooling air in the first set and hot air in the second set, without the cooling air and the hot air contacting one another. A first series of fans causes flow of the external cooling air through the rows. A second series of fans causes flow of the internal hot air through the columns. External and internal fan controllers control the speed of each fan independently such that external cooling air flows through different rows at different rates and internal hot air flows through different columns at different rates.