Dynamic Load Bench for Crossing Gate Mechanism Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for developing and testing crossing gate mechanisms require a full gate mechanism setup, which is costly and dangerous, necessitating a safer and more efficient simulation method.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic load system comprising a first electric machine simulating a load and a second electric machine, mechanically coupled with a control unit to achieve specific performance, allowing for the simulation of a crossing gate mechanism without the need for a complete gate setup.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a full gate mechanism setup is used for testing, then testing accuracy is improved, but cost and safety risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting accuracyVSAvoidsafety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a dynamic load system that copies the essential mechanical characteristics of a gate mechanism without using the actual gate arm. The system uses an electric motor coupled with a dynamic load device to simulate the torque and motion profiles of a real gate mechanism, enabling accurate testing while eliminating safety hazards associated with heavy moving parts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the essential testing functions from the complete gate mechanism by isolating the motor and load components. The dynamic load system separates the critical testing elements (motor control, torque measurement, motion profiling) from the dangerous components (full gate arm, support structure), allowing testing to proceed without the harmful elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If a full gate mechanism setup is used for testing, then testing accuracy is improved, but setup cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting accuracyVSAvoidsetup cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of building an expensive full-scale gate mechanism replica, the patent creates a simplified dynamic load system that copies only the essential mechanical behavior. The system uses a motor coupled with controllable load devices to replicate torque and motion characteristics, achieving accurate testing at a fraction of the cost of a complete gate mechanism setup

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and retains only the essential testing components (motor, coupling device, dynamic load mechanism, control system) while eliminating expensive structural elements like the gate arm, support posts, and safety infrastructure. This extraction dramatically reduces setup cost while preserving testing accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If a full gate mechanism setup is used for testing, then mechanical performance testing is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical performance testingVSAvoidsetup complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent copies the essential mechanical performance characteristics (torque, speed, acceleration profiles) through a simplified dynamic load system. Rather than replicating the entire gate mechanism structure, the system uses an electric motor with controlled load application to simulate various operating conditions, achieving comprehensive mechanical testing with reduced complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical linkages and structural components with an electrically controlled dynamic load system. The motor-coupling-load assembly uses electrical control signals to generate the appropriate mechanical forces and motion profiles, substituting elaborate mechanical arrangements with a more controllable and simpler electromechanical system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables safe and efficient development, improvement, and testing of crossing gate mechanisms by simulating the operation of gate arms at a bench test level, reducing setup costs and safety risks while allowing for various load profiles and configurations.

Implementation Method 1

a first electric machine (305) simulating a load, a second electric machine (310)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a coupling device (315) for mechanically coupling the first electric machine (305) to the second electric machine (310)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical coupling: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS12095401B2Dynamic load system and method for simulating a crossing gate mechanism
Publication Date: 2024.09.17 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC
  • US12095401B2 patent drawing
  • US12095401B2 patent drawing
  • US12095401B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A dynamic load system includes a first electric machine simulating a load, a second electric machine, a coupling device for mechanically coupling the first electric machine to the second electric machine, a control unit with a processor and connected to the first electric machine and the second electric machine, wherein the control unit is configured to control the first electric machine and the second electric machine, wherein a reference value of the second electric machine is utilized to achieve a specific performance of the first electric machine.