Grade Crossing Predictor With Speed-Adaptive Activation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Grade crossing predictor circuits fail to function reliably in electrified territories and areas with significant electromagnetic interference, leading to premature activation of warning systems for trains, which is inefficient for slower-moving trains.

Innovation Solution

A grade crossing warning system that utilizes a combination of a track occupancy circuit and a wayside signaling device to determine the presence and speed of a train, calculating a delay period based on the maximum allowable speed indicated by the signal aspect to activate the warning system only when necessary, thereby reducing unnecessary activation times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a track occupancy circuit is used to detect train presence and activate the warning system, then the warning system activates early to ensure safety, but the activation occurs significantly longer before train arrival for slower trains than necessary

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of warning system activationVSAvoidunnecessary activation time for slower trains
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the warning activation timing based on the detected train speed. The controller calculates a delay period that varies with train speed, allowing the warning to activate at the optimal time for each specific train rather than using a fixed early activation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the temporal parameter of warning activation by introducing a speed-dependent delay period. This delay is calculated based on the train's maximum allowable speed and the distance to the crossing, transforming the static activation timing into a dynamic parameter that adapts to different train speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If grade crossing predictor circuits are used to determine train distance and speed, then constant warning time can be achieved, but the circuits fail to work reliably in electrified territory and areas with electromagnetic interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstant warning time activationVSAvoidoperation in electrified territory
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses an intermediary approach by relying on existing track occupancy circuit infrastructure and wayside signaling devices rather than installing new electromagnetic sensing equipment in challenging environments. This leverages proven, reliable existing systems to achieve the desired functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replicates the speed detection functionality by using the existing wayside signaling device information, which already contains speed-related data for train control purposes. This avoids the need for separate speed sensing equipment that might fail in electrified territory.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If the warning system activates as soon as a train is detected in the monitored track section, then safety is ensured for maximum speed trains, but unnecessary delays occur for trains traveling significantly lower than maximum authorized speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety for maximum speed trainsVSAvoidefficiency of warning system operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static, speed-independent warning activation to dynamic, speed-adaptive activation. The controller continuously monitors train speed and adjusts the timing of warning activation accordingly, optimizing the balance between safety and operational efficiency for each train.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary speed assessment and delay calculation upon detecting a train in the monitored section. This preliminary action allows the controller to determine the appropriate activation timing before the train reaches the crossing, ensuring both safety and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2371666B1Crossing predictor with authorized track speed input
Publication Date: 2017.01.18 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC
  • EP2371666B1 patent drawing
  • EP2371666B1 patent drawing
  • EP2371666B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for controlling a grade crossing warning system employs a track occupancy circuit or other device to detect the presence of a train in the approach to a grade crossing and an indirect indication of a maximum authorized speed of the train in order to determine an amount of time to delay activation of the grade crossing warning system after the train has been detected. The indirect indication is preferably encoded onto a signal associated with the track occupancy circuit, preferably using a frequency shift technique. The indirect indication may be supplied by a wayside signal device.