Crosstalk Testing for Special-Shaped Screens

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for testing crosstalk are not suitable for special-shaped screens, as they fail to accurately measure crosstalk interference due to differences in driving mode, pixel structure, and relative position layout between the main and secondary screens.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines standard and actual parameter values of crosstalk by comparing luminance at central and non-central points on both screens, calculating the degree of crosstalk interference, and using these values to comprehensively measure crosstalk between the main and secondary screens, adapting to actual grayscale displays for higher accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional crosstalk testing methods are used for integrated screens, then the testing process is simple, but the testing accuracy deteriorates when applied to special-shaped screens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting process simplicityVSAvoidcrosstalk testing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the testing approach for different regions of the screen. It identifies that special-shaped screens have non-uniform pixel structures and driving modes in different areas, so the crosstalk testing must be adapted to local characteristics rather than using a uniform method across the entire screen. This involves setting different test point locations and calculating crosstalk parameters specific to each region's structural features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the crosstalk testing process into multiple independent measurement and calculation steps. It divides the screen into multiple test point locations, measures luminance at each point separately, and calculates crosstalk parameters for each segment independently. This segmentation allows the complex testing of special-shaped screens to be broken down into manageable, accurate local measurements that can be aggregated for comprehensive evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If standard crosstalk measurement methods are applied to special-shaped screens, then the testing method is universal, but the measurement precision deteriorates due to differences in driving mode and pixel structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting method universalityVSAvoidcrosstalk measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the testing method adaptive rather than static. It dynamically adjusts the testing parameters, test point locations, and calculation methods based on the actual screen structure, driving mode, and pixel arrangement detected during testing. This dynamic adaptation allows the same testing system to accurately handle both integrated screens and special-shaped screens with varying configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key testing parameters based on the screen type being tested. It modifies test point coordinates, luminance measurement thresholds, and crosstalk calculation formulas according to the detected pixel structure and driving mode. This parameter adaptation enables the testing method to maintain high precision across different screen configurations while preserving a universal testing framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If conventional testing methods are used, then the testing procedure is straightforward, but the ability to detect actual display states deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting procedure simplicityVSAvoiddisplay state detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the measured luminance values and calculated crosstalk parameters are used to verify whether the actual display state matches the expected state. The system continuously monitors test point luminance, compares it against reference values, and adjusts subsequent measurements based on detected deviations. This feedback loop ensures accurate detection of actual display states while maintaining an automated testing procedure that remains relatively simple to operate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11647174B2Method for testing crosstalk of screen
Publication Date: 2023.05.09 KUNSHAN GO VISIONOX OPTO ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US11647174B2 patent drawing
  • US11647174B2 patent drawing
  • US11647174B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for testing crosstalk of a screen. The method includes when a main screen and a secondary screen simultaneously display pictures of different grayscales, determining a standard parameter value of crosstalk for each of the secondary screen and the main screen caused by the other; determining an actual parameter value of crosstalk for each of the secondary screen and the main screen caused by the other; calculating a degree of crosstalk for each of the secondary screen and the main screen caused by the other, according to the standard parameter value of crosstalk and actual parameter value of crosstalk for each of the secondary screen and the main screen caused by the other, respectively.