Crowd Dynamics Event Detection via Complexity Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing event detection systems struggle to identify unforeseen events in crowds, as they require specific heuristic rules and become impractical for detecting multiple types of events, and cannot directly detect cues like smells or unusual behavior.

Innovation Solution

The method analyzes crowd dynamics by calculating values representative of crowd reactions through video footage, using Wright's complexity metric to identify discrepancies, which alerts operators to potential events, regardless of the event type, and can be implemented in real-time or for pre-recorded footage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If heuristic rules are used to detect specific events, then detection accuracy for known events is improved, but the system becomes impractical for detecting multiple types of unforeseen events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent detection accuracyVSAvoidevent type coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by creating a single event detection system that can detect multiple types of events (terrorist attacks, fires, earthquakes, social unrest, unusual packages) without requiring separate heuristic rules for each event type. The system uses complexity measures and crowd dynamics analysis as a universal detection mechanism that adapts to different event types automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by monitoring changes in crowd dynamics parameters (movement patterns, density, velocity) to detect events. Instead of using fixed heuristic rules, the system detects events through changes in measurable parameters of crowd behavior, allowing it to adapt to various event types through parameter variation rather than rule multiplication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If direct observation of events is used, then detection reliability is improved, but the system cannot detect cues like smells or indirect reactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent detection reliabilityVSAvoidindirect cue detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses crowd reactions as an intermediary to detect events indirectly. Instead of directly observing events or their physical cues (smoke, explosions), the system monitors how crowds react to these events through changes in their behavior patterns. The crowd serves as a mediator that translates various event types into observable behavioral changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct mechanical/sensory detection systems with a behavioral analysis system. Instead of using sensors to directly detect physical cues like smoke or explosions, the system substitutes direct observation with indirect observation of crowd behavior patterns, using computational analysis of video footage to infer event occurrence from behavioral changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If multiple specific event types are monitored with dedicated rules, then detection precision for each event is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent detection precisionVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces system complexity by implementing a universal detection mechanism that handles multiple event types through a single analytical framework. Instead of maintaining separate detection systems for different event types, the system uses a unified approach based on crowd dynamics analysis and complexity measures, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple detection functions into a single integrated system. By combining the detection of various event types into one unified system that analyzes crowd behavior patterns, the patent eliminates the need for multiple separate detection mechanisms, thereby reducing system complexity while maintaining comprehensive event detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9165372B2Improvements relating to event detection
Publication Date: 2015.10.20 BAE SYSTEMS PLC
  • US9165372B2 patent drawing
  • US9165372B2 patent drawing
  • US9165372B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of event detection for detecting the occurrence of an event in a crowd is disclosed. The method includes the steps of providing video footage of the crowd, which video footage includes a series of image frames; calculating a series of values representative of the crowd dynamics, which series of values is calculated in dependence on the series of image frames; analyzing the series of values to identify any discrepancies occurring in the series of values; and, in response to identifying a discrepancy, providing an output signal to alert an operator that an event has been detected. In preferred embodiments, the series of values are related to the complexity of the crowd dynamics. Apparatus suitable for carrying out such a method is also disclosed.