Crowd Runaway Control for Electric Rope Shovels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial machines like electric rope shovels experience control issues during 'crowd runaways' due to excessive payload, leading to uncontrolled dipper movement and increased cycle times, potentially causing damage and inefficiency.

Innovation Solution

A control system that monitors actual and requested dipper positions, adjusting crowd motor torque or setting brakes to resolve runaway conditions by comparing the two states and applying corrective forces or parameters when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the dipper is filled with excessive payload, then the digging capacity is improved, but the crowd control becomes unstable and runaway conditions occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovepayloadVSAvoidcrowd control
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors the actual crowd system state (dipper position, crowd motor position) and compares it with the requested state. When a runaway condition is detected (difference exceeds threshold), the system automatically adjusts the crowd motor torque to resolve the condition, creating a closed-loop feedback control mechanism that maintains stability even with excessive payload

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the crowd motor operating parameters (torque, speed) based on the detected runaway condition. The controller sets the crowd motor parameter to a corrective value when the difference between actual and requested states exceeds a threshold, allowing the system to adapt to varying load conditions and prevent instability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the swing speed is increased to improve productivity, then the digging efficiency is improved, but the centrifugal forces increase causing crowd runaway

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedigging efficiencyVSAvoidcentrifugal force
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The control system proactively detects runaway conditions by comparing actual and requested dipper positions before the condition worsens. When a potential runaway is detected (difference exceeds threshold), the system preemptively adjusts the crowd motor torque to counteract the centrifugal forces, preventing full runaway rather than reacting after it occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The real-time monitoring and comparison of actual versus requested crowd system state provides continuous feedback that allows the system to detect and correct runaway conditions caused by high swing speeds, enabling the operator to maintain higher productivity without compromising control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Stability of the object's composition

If the crowd motor torque is increased to resolve runaway, then the control stability is improved, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol stabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies corrective torque only to the extent necessary to resolve the runaway condition. The controller monitors the difference between actual and requested states and applies minimal corrective action (setting crowd motor parameter to a value greater than normal operating value only when difference >= threshold), avoiding excessive energy consumption while maintaining control stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system operates in discrete correction cycles, monitoring the crowd system state continuously and applying corrective torque only when runaway conditions are detected. Once the condition is resolved, the system returns to normal operation, creating a periodic rather than continuous high-energy state

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively regains control of the dipper movement, reducing cycle times and preventing damage by dynamically adjusting motor parameters to align actual and requested movements, thereby enhancing operational efficiency and safety.

Implementation Method 1

a crowd motor torque

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorque: Torque

Implementation Method 2

setting the brakes for one or more system motors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

the swing speed and the resultant centrifugal forces on the dipper

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS10683633B2Controlling crowd runaway of an industrial machine
Publication Date: 2020.06.16 JOY GLOBAL SURFACE MINING INC
  • US10683633B2 patent drawing
  • US10683633B2 patent drawing
  • US10683633B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for controlling the operation of an industrial machine during crowd runaway conditions. The system includes a controller that monitors and compares an actual crowd system state (e.g., an actual dipper position) with a requested crowd system state (e.g., a requested dipper position from the operator). If the controller determines that the crowd system is behaving contrary to requested crowd system behavior, the controller adjusts a crowd parameter, such as a crowd motor torque, to resolve the runaway condition.