Crowd Sourcing Data Quality Error Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods fail to optimize human resources for resolving data quality errors in information assets, which are critical for business processes, due to inefficiencies in identifying and correcting issues such as spelling errors, missing data, and inconsistencies.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for information governance crowd sourcing, where data quality errors are identified and routed to crowds with the necessary performance level for correction, using a crowd hierarchy to select appropriate workers and compute wages for their work.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If current manual methods are used to resolve data quality errors, then human resources can be deployed, but productivity and efficiency are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata quality error resolution efficiencyVSAvoidtime to identify and correct data quality errors
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically detecting data quality errors through validation rules and routing them to appropriate crowd workers without manual intervention. The platform autonomously manages the entire workflow from error identification to resolution, eliminating the need for manual oversight while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary platform that connects data quality issues with appropriate crowd workers. This intermediary system matches errors to workers based on performance levels and expertise, optimizing the resolution process and significantly improving productivity while reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If a crowd hierarchy is implemented to select workers, then result quality improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata correction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity for crowd management
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The crowd hierarchy is segmented into multiple performance levels, with each level specialized for specific types of data quality tasks. This segmentation allows the system to match complex errors with high-performance workers while simpler errors are handled by lower-level workers, improving accuracy without requiring all workers to have equal expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of worker selection by using performance levels and matching criteria rather than random assignment. By dynamically adjusting which workers are selected based on error complexity and worker capabilities, the system achieves high accuracy while keeping the matching logic manageable through automated algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If multiple crowds are used to correct errors, then productivity increases, but loss of information may occur through inconsistent corrections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction throughputVSAvoiddata consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where corrections made by crowd workers are validated against original data quality rules and reviewed by quality assurance processes. This feedback loop ensures that parallel corrections maintain consistency and do not introduce new errors, allowing high productivity without sacrificing data integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by having different crowds work on different portions of data quality errors based on their expertise. Rather than having all crowds work on all errors, the system distributes tasks selectively, which maintains consistency while maximizing overall productivity through specialized handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9286586B2Information governance crowd sourcing
Publication Date: 2016.03.15 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9286586B2 patent drawing
  • US9286586B2 patent drawing
  • US9286586B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, computer program product, and system for information governance crowd sourcing by, responsive to receiving a data quality exception identifying one or more data quality errors in a data store, identifying a performance level required to correct the data quality errors, selecting, from a crowd hierarchy, a first one or more crowds meeting the defined performance level, wherein the crowd hierarchy ranks the performance of one or more crowds, and routing, by operation of one or more computer processors, the one or more data quality errors to the selected crowds for correction.