Crowdfunding Server Managing Gender Ratios for Event Bookings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional crowd-funding platforms for events do not consider gender ratios and are inefficient for groups to manage pledges, leading to issues like unsold or undersold bookings and difficulty in ensuring male to female ratios, which affects the likelihood of successful event bookings.

Innovation Solution

A crowd-funding server system that allows users to pledge for multiple events and automatically manages pledges based on gender ratios, ensuring that events are booked efficiently by adjusting group pledges and waitlists to meet gender thresholds, thereby reducing financial risk for venues and enhancing user experience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional crowd-funding platforms allow users to pledge for multiple events without gender ratio consideration, then users have flexibility in event selection, but venues face financial risk from unsold or undersold bookings due to imbalanced gender ratios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser flexibility in event selectionVSAvoidevent booking success
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of gender ratio by introducing male and female threshold values that must be met for event booking. This ensures venues receive guaranteed attendance with balanced gender representation, reducing financial risk while allowing users flexibility to pledge for multiple events

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by requiring users to pledge for events before the events occur, and by automatically managing pledge assignments to ensure gender thresholds are met. This advance planning secures bookings while maintaining user flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If users manually manage pledges to multiple events, then users can control their commitments, but groups face inefficiency and complexity in coordinating event attendance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepledge managementVSAvoidtime for coordinate event attendance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides self-service by automatically managing user pledges and group coordination. The server handles pledge assignments, event booking notifications, and group coordination without requiring manual intervention, making the process easier and faster

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical manual coordination process with an automated server-based system that handles pledge management, group coordination, and event booking notifications, eliminating time-consuming manual communication

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If the system enforces strict gender ratio thresholds for event booking, then venues ensure successful bookings, but users face reduced flexibility in event selection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent booking successVSAvoiduser flexibility in event selection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by allowing users to pledge for multiple events beyond what is strictly needed, with the understanding that only necessary pledges will be fulfilled. This ensures gender thresholds are met while maintaining user flexibility through optional extra pledges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Reliability

If the system automatically charges users for pledged tickets upon event booking, then venues secure funding, but users face financial risk if they cannot attend all pledged events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevenue funding securityVSAvoiduser financial management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by charging users only for events that are actually booked, not for all pledged events. This secures venue funding through successful bookings while protecting users from financial risk for events they cannot attend

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback by monitoring which events are successfully booked and automatically adjusting charges accordingly. Users are charged only for fulfilled pledges, providing real-time feedback on actual financial obligations based on booking outcomes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11783239B2Methods and systems for managing simultaneous events
Publication Date: 2023.10.10 JOACHIM JOSHUA CHRISTOPHER
  • US11783239B2 patent drawing
  • US11783239B2 patent drawing
  • US11783239B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments disclosed herein provide systems and methods for a crowd-funding server for users to pledge to purchase tickets to an event based on a number of users that have pledged to purchase tickets for an event and the gender ratio of the users that have pledged to purchase the tickets for the event.