Crowd-Sourced Labeling System Using ML Example Subsets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Assessors on crowd-sourced platforms, being non-professional and varying in expertise, face difficulties in understanding tasks without actual examples, leading to inconsistent labeling quality.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that generates a subset of examples similar to the digital task, based on past tasks, to provide maximum benchmark coverage with minimal samples, and presents these examples to crowd-sourced workers to solicit labels, using machine learning algorithms to remove bias and cluster labels for improved accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If crowd-sourced workers are used to perform tasks, then cost and time are reduced compared to professional assessors, but labeling quality becomes inconsistent due to varying expertise levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion speedVSAvoidlabeling quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by generating and presenting example labels before the worker performs the actual task. These examples are created using machine learning models trained on historical data, showing workers what correct labels look like for similar tasks, thereby preparing them to produce consistent quality work

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary mechanism - a machine learning model that generates example labels based on historical data. This intermediary bridges the gap between professional assessor quality and crowd worker capability by providing reference examples that guide workers toward consistent labeling standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If more examples are provided to workers to improve understanding, then labeling accuracy improves, but the complexity and time required for task preparation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling accuracyVSAvoidtask preparation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters by dynamically adjusting the number and type of examples provided based on task characteristics and worker performance. The machine learning model selects relevant examples from historical data, transforming the static example provision into a dynamic, adaptive process that optimizes for both accuracy and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of historical task examples and presents them to workers. Instead of requiring complex original content creation for each task, the system replicates and adapts proven examples from the past, reducing preparation complexity while maintaining labeling accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11727329B2Method and system for receiving label for digital task executed within crowd-sourced environment
Publication Date: 2023.08.15 Y E HUB ARMENIA LLC
  • US11727329B2 patent drawing
  • US11727329B2 patent drawing
  • US11727329B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is disclosed a method and system for receiving a label for a digital task executed within a computer-implemented crowd-sourced environment, the method comprising: receiving, an indication of the digital task to be processed in the computer-implemented crowd-sourced environment; generating, a subset of examples, the subset of examples based on past digital tasks executed in the computer-implemented crowd-sourced environment, each of the subset of examples being similar to the digital task within a pre-determined similarity threshold; the subset of examples having a number of examples selected such that to provide maximum benchmark coverage with a minimum number of samples in the subset of examples; associating, the subset of examples to the digital task to be presented; causing the digital task to be presented on a computing device of at least one crowd-sourced worker in the computer-implemented crowd-sourced environment to solicit the label for the digital task.