Crowdsourced Map Data Cleanup via Expectation-Maximization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current crowdsourcing platforms are inadequate for accurately locating targets of interest in images, as they either rely on ambiguous user inputs or fail to provide precise location data, leading to missed targets and false positives in applications like search and rescue or refugee assessment.

Innovation Solution

A platform that utilizes a crowdsourced search and locate server to process tagging data from multiple users, computing agreement and disagreement values, and performing an expectation-maximization analysis to estimate the precise locations of targets, thereby improving the accuracy of target identification and location.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If crowdsourced tagging data from multiple users is collected, then quantity of target location data increases, but measurement precision of target location decreases due to user ambiguity and errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of tagging dataVSAvoidprecision of target location
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where initial target location estimates are generated from crowd tagging data, then used to guide additional crowd members to specifically tag nearby targets. The system continuously refines location estimates by incorporating new tagging data and feedback from previous iterations, improving precision while utilizing the quantity of available data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary processing of crowd tagging data to generate initial target location estimates before using these estimates to guide subsequent data collection. This preliminary action allows the system to establish a baseline location that can then be refined through targeted additional tagging efforts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If automated image analysis is used, then productivity of target identification increases, but reliability of target detection decreases due to lack of specialized training

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproductivity of image analysisVSAvoidreliability of target detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges automated image analysis capabilities with crowdsourced human tagging. Automated methods provide rapid initial processing and guide the distribution of crowd tasks, while human taggers provide reliable detection for complex or ambiguous targets. The combination leverages both speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses automated analysis results as an intermediary to guide and coordinate crowd tagging efforts. The automated system identifies regions of interest and suggested target locations, which then serve as intermediaries to focus human attention on specific areas needing verification or additional tagging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If crowd members are randomly assigned image chips, then ease of operation increases, but measurement precision of target location decreases due to lack of focused verification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of task assignmentVSAvoidprecision of target location estimation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the task assignment strategy based on the current state of target location estimation. As precision requirements increase or uncertainty in certain regions is detected, the system transitions from random assignment to targeted assignment of image chips to crowd members near estimated target locations for verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If expectation-maximization analysis is performed iteratively, then measurement precision of target location improves, but loss of time increases due to multiple iterations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of target location estimateVSAvoidtime for analysis iterations
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs a limited number of expectation-maximization iterations rather than exhaustive iterations. This partial action provides sufficient precision improvement for most applications without incurring the full time cost of multiple iterations, balancing accuracy requirements with computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10083186B2System and method for large scale crowdsourcing of map data cleanup and correction
Publication Date: 2018.09.25 VANTOR INC
  • US10083186B2 patent drawing
  • US10083186B2 patent drawing
  • US10083186B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for large-scale crowd sourcing of map data cleanup and correction, comprising an application server that generates image data, sends image data to a user device, receives tagging data provided by the device user, and provides tags to a crowdsourced search and locate server based on tagging data from a user device, a crowdsourced search and locate server that receives tags from an application server, computes agreement and disagreement values and performs expectation-maximization analysis, and a map data server that stores and provides map data, and a method for estimating location and quality of a set of geolocation data.