Crown Ball Bearing Retainer Structure for High-Speed Deformation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing crown cages for ball bearings face issues with deformation, stress, and moldability during high-speed rotation, particularly in small-sized bearings, due to design limitations and material flow constraints.

Innovation Solution

A crown cage design featuring pillar portions with claw ends, a wider pocket outer diameter, and convex portions on the main portion bottom surface, made from reinforced resin materials, which reduces weight and stress while maintaining good moldability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If a hole communicating with the recessed area of the axial portion and penetrating in the axial direction is formed in the base portion to reduce material amount and suppress radial deformation, then the mass is reduced and radial deformation is suppressed, but the periphery of the hole becomes too thin and strength is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass of cageVSAvoidstrength of base portion
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from axial penetration (one-dimensional hole through base portion) to radial extension (two-dimensional rib structure extending from base portion outer diameter surface). This dimensional change allows material removal for weight reduction while maintaining structural integrity through the rib's radial configuration rather than creating thin-walled holes that compromise strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the cage structure is modified to reduce deformation and stress during high-speed rotation, then fatigue failure is suppressed, but the moldability and resin flow during injection molding may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue resistance of cageVSAvoidmoldability of cage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The cage is segmented into functionally distinct components: the base portion for structural support and moldability, the axial portion for ball engagement, and the rib for targeted reinforcement. This segmentation allows each part to be optimized independently - the base portion maintains good moldability while the rib provides the necessary reinforcement for fatigue resistance during high-speed rotation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Reinforcement is applied locally through the rib structure extending from the base portion outer diameter surface, rather than uniformly throughout the entire cage. This localized reinforcement provides the necessary strength for fatigue resistance in critical areas while maintaining overall light weight and not interfering with the injection molding process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the cage is designed to prevent contact with outer ring and seal by suppressing deformation, then wear and heat generation are reduced, but the structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear and heat generation of cageVSAvoidstructural complexity of cage
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement function is extracted as a separate rib component extending from the base portion, rather than integrating reinforcement throughout the entire cage structure. This extraction creates a simple, clean design where the rib specifically addresses the contact prevention function without adding unnecessary complexity to other parts of the cage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively suppresses deformation and stress during high-speed rotation, preventing wear, vibration, and heat generation, while ensuring efficient resin flow and moldability.

Implementation Method 1

the stress may act on the cage 100 due to the centrifugal force during the high-speed rotation, and the cage 100 may be deformed toward an outer diameter side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS20250271032A1Crown-type retainer for ball bearing, and ball bearing
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 NSK LTD
  • US20250271032A1 patent drawing
  • US20250271032A1 patent drawing
  • US20250271032A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A crown cage for a ball bearing includes an annular main portion, pillar portions protruding in an axial direction at predetermined intervals in a circumferential direction from the main portion, and a pocket formed between the adjacent pillar portions and having a spherical concave surface capable of holding a ball. The pillar portion includes a pair of claw portions having tip end portions arranged at intervals therebetween and a connection portion connecting the pair of claw portions. An inlet portion having a width shorter than a diameter of the ball and for inserting the ball is provided between the tip end portions of the two adjacent claw portions constituting the pocket. A distance from an outer circumferential surface of the pocket to a center of the crown cage for a ball bearing is larger than a distance from an outer circumferential surface of the pillar portion to the center.