CRT Pacing Site Selection via Mechanical Electrical Synchrony

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) methods face challenges in selecting optimal pacing sites and timing parameters due to variability in mechanical and electrical heart activity signals, which can be influenced by confounding factors, making it difficult to achieve consistent patient response.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for selecting a pacing site based on a combination of mechanical and electrical synchrony indices, where changes in mechanical and electrical heart activity are analyzed at multiple sites, and the sites are sorted and ranked to identify a common site that provides the highest overall improvement in synchrony, ensuring effective CRT delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If mechanical sensors or imaging techniques are used to evaluate heart function, then hemodynamic performance can be assessed, but the signals have high variability and are influenced by confounding factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation precisionVSAvoidsignal reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple sensing modalities (mechanical sensors, electrical sensors, and imaging techniques) to evaluate heart function. By merging these different measurement approaches, the system compensates for the weaknesses of individual methods - electrical signals provide timing precision while mechanical signals provide hemodynamic information, and imaging provides structural context. This multi-modal integration reduces the high variability and confounding factor influence that plague single-modality approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces signal processing algorithms and control logic as intermediaries between the raw sensor signals and the therapy delivery decisions. These intermediaries filter out confounding factors, average out variability through multiple measurements, and integrate information from different sources to produce reliable control decisions for CRT therapy parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If signal averaging is used to evaluate mechanical sensors, then some variability is reduced, but the evaluation is influenced by variations between cardiac events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal evaluation precisionVSAvoidinformation loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic signal processing that adapts to the specific characteristics of each cardiac event while maintaining consistency across events. Rather than simple averaging that loses event-specific information, the system uses dynamic algorithms that identify and track relevant features across multiple events, preserving important variations while reducing noise. This allows the system to maintain measurement precision without discarding clinically relevant information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If multiple therapy control parameters are adjusted, then CRT efficacy can be optimized, but the complexity of parameter selection increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCRT efficacyVSAvoidparameter selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a closed-loop feedback system where multiple sensors continuously monitor heart function and provide real-time information about the effectiveness of current CRT parameters. This feedback drives automatic adjustment of therapy control parameters (AV delay, VV delay, pacing sites) without requiring complex manual optimization. The feedback mechanism simplifies the user interface while maintaining the ability to optimize multiple parameters simultaneously, resolving the contradiction between efficacy and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-optimization of CRT parameters by automatically analyzing sensor data and adjusting therapy settings without external intervention. The device autonomously evaluates the effectiveness of different parameter combinations and selects the optimal configuration, eliminating the need for complex clinician-driven parameter selection processes while maintaining high CRT efficacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3024539B1Combination of feedback on mechanical and electrical resynchronization to select therapy parameters
Publication Date: 2018.10.17 MEDTRONIC INC
  • EP3024539B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3024539B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3024539B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system and method select a pacing site for a cardiac pacing therapy. A change from a baseline mechanical activity is extracted from a signal of mechanical heart activity during pacing at each one of multiple pacing sites along a heart chamber. A change from a baseline electrical activity is extracted from a signal of electrical heart activity during pacing at each of the of pacing sites. The pacing sites are sorted in a first order based upon the changes in mechanical heart activity and in a second order based upon the changes in electrical heart activity. A pacing site is selected from the multiple pacing sites as a common pacing site between the first order and the second order.