Cruciform Tower Post-Tensioning Reduces Connection Failure Points

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wind turbine tower assembly methods require numerous connections that can be potential failure points and are time-consuming, especially when using prefabricated wall parts that need to form polygonal rings or monolithic sections within transportation constraints.

Innovation Solution

The use of post-tensioning cables within longitudinal sections of the tower, with varying cross-sectional geometries and precast components, reduces the number of connections and field casting, while maintaining structural integrity through circumferential compressive forces generated by anchored strands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If multiple prefabricated wall parts are assembled side by side to form polygonal rings, then the tower can resist great forces in horizontal and vertical directions, but the number of connections increases significantly creating potential failure points and requiring additional assembly time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce resistanceVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The tower is divided into discrete prefabricated wall parts that can be manufactured separately and assembled on-site. Each wall part is a complete structural unit that can be handled and positioned independently, allowing parallel manufacturing and streamlined assembly processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple wall parts are combined to form complete tower levels, with the invention specifically merging two wall parts per level to form a circular tower section. This reduction from three or more segments to just two segments per level directly reduces the number of connections required while maintaining structural integrity and force resistance capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Strength

If multiple connections are implemented for each mast level to ensure structural integrity, then the tower can resist great forces, but the number of potential failure points increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidfailure points
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By merging the tower structure into just two wall parts per level, the number of connections is halved compared to using three or more segments. Each connection point represents a potential failure point, so reducing from 9+ connections to approximately 6 connections per level (3 horizontal + 3 vertical) directly improves reliability while maintaining structural integrity through fewer, but equally robust, connection points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Area of stationary object

If monolithic elements are used to expand cross-section footprint within transportation constraints, then the tower can achieve larger dimensions, but the element size is limited by transport box dimensions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecross-section footprintVSAvoidmonolithic element size
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The tower cross-section is segmented into two large prefabricated wall parts instead of requiring a single monolithic element. This segmentation allows each part to be sized within transportation constraints while the combined footprint of both parts achieves the desired large cross-sectional dimensions for structural stability and force resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution transitions from a single-dimension constraint (monolithic element size limited by transport box) to a two-dimension solution (two smaller elements that fit in transport but combine to create larger footprint when assembled). By utilizing the assembly dimension, the tower achieves larger cross-sectional area without requiring individually larger transportable elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the efficiency and reliability of tower assembly by minimizing potential failure points and reducing assembly time, while allowing for taller, more structurally sound towers with reduced long-term fatigue risk.

Implementation Method 1

The use of post-tensioning cables within longitudinal sections of the tower, with varying cross-sectional geometries and precast components, reduces the number of connections and field casting, while maintaining structural integrity through circumferential compressive forces generated by anchored strands.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPost-tensioning: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP3036436B1Cruciform tower
Publication Date: 2020.07.08 TINDALL CORP
  • EP3036436B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3036436B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3036436B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A tower includes a plurality of stacked sections extending in a longitudinal direction from a base section to a top section, at least one of the stacked sections including a first block and a second block joined together, the first block and the second block having interlocking portions such that a first portion of the first block is located above a first portion of the second block in the longitudinal direction.