Integrated Crude Oil Upgrading via Coking and Hydroprocessing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for upgrading and desulfurizing crude oil face challenges with catalyst deactivation due to contaminants like organic nickel, organic vanadium, and poly nuclear aromatic compounds, leading to reduced on-stream factor and increased processing costs in hydroprocessing units.

Innovation Solution

An integrated process that combines hydroprocessing and coking, involving fractionation, thermal cracking, and gasification to produce hydrogen, which is recycled for hydroprocessing, while using adsorbent materials to enhance the separation and quality of hydrocarbon streams.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If hydroprocessing is used to desulfurize crude oil, then sulfur content is reduced, but catalyst deactivation occurs due to metal contaminants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesulfur contentVSAvoidcatalyst activity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The process segments the crude oil feedstock into different boiling point ranges (light, medium, heavy fractions) and processes each fraction separately. This allows the hydroprocessing unit to handle lighter fractions with lower metal content while sending heavier fractions to coking, thereby reducing catalyst deactivation while still achieving sulfur removal from the overall feedstock

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The process extracts and removes metal-containing contaminants through the coking process which converts heavy fractions into coke, gas, and liquid products. The coke acts as a sink for metals and sulfur, effectively extracting these harmful components from the feedstock before hydroprocessing of the remaining lighter fractions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If fixed-bed reactor units are used for hydroprocessing, then desulfurization is achieved, but frequent catalyst replacement is required due to metal deposition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesulfur contentVSAvoidon-stream factor
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The process performs preliminary action by removing heavy fractions and metal-containing components through coking before the hydroprocessing step. This pre-treatment prevents metals from reaching the hydroprocessing catalyst, eliminating the need for frequent catalyst replacement and maintaining high on-stream factors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated process enables continuous operation by maintaining steady-state hydroprocessing of lighter fractions while simultaneously operating the coking unit to continuously remove heavy fractions and metals. This continuous separation and treatment approach maximizes the on-stream factor of the hydroprocessing unit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If heavy crude oils with high metals and sulfur content are processed, then more valuable liquid and gas products are produced, but processing costs increase due to catalyst deactivation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalue of liquid and gas productsVSAvoidprocessing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The process converts the harmful high-metal and high-sulfur heavy crude oil fractions into beneficial coke, gas, and liquid products through coking. The metals and sulfur that would otherwise deactivate catalysts and increase processing costs are transformed into saleable coke products and combustible gas, turning a liability into an asset

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The process changes the physical and chemical parameters of the feedstock by separating it into different boiling point ranges and processing each range appropriately. Heavy fractions are converted to coke and gas through thermal cracking, while lighter fractions undergo hydroprocessing, optimizing the value of each product stream while minimizing catalyst deactivation costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively upgrades and desulfurizes crude oil, increasing the on-stream factor, reducing catalyst deactivation, and lowering processing costs by converting heavy hydrocarbons into lighter, higher-value products with reduced sulfur and nitrogen content.

Implementation Method 1

fractionating both the liquid hydrocarbon feedstock and coker thermally cracked hydrocarbon products in a fractionating zone to separate commingled hydrocarbons into a hydrocarbon distillates stream and a coker recycle stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFractionation: Fractionation

Implementation Method 2

Delayed coking utilizes thermal decomposition of heavy liquid hydrocarbons to produce coke, gas and liquid product streams of varying boiling ranges

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal cracking: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 3

hydrocracking processes break the carbon-carbon bonds in feed molecules into simpler molecules (e.g., light hydrocarbons) having higher average volatility and economic value. Additionally, hydrocracking processes typically improve the quality of the hydrocarbon feedstock by increasing the hydrogen-to-carbon ratio

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrocracking: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 4

hydrocracking processes typically improve the quality of the hydrocarbon feedstock by increasing the hydrogen-to-carbon ratio and by removing organo-sulfur and organo-nitrogen compounds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodesulfurization: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 5

hydrocracking processes typically improve the quality of the hydrocarbon feedstock by increasing the hydrogen-to-carbon ratio and by removing organo-sulfur and organo-nitrogen compounds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodenitrogenation: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 6

gasifying at least a portion of the recovered coke in the presence of an oxygen-containing gas to produce hydrogen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGasification: Combustion

Implementation Method 7

In certain embodiments, adsorbent material is added to the fractionating zone or the coker recycle stream prior to thermal cracking

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS11384300B2Integrated process and system to upgrade crude oil
Publication Date: 2022.07.12 SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO
  • US11384300B2 patent drawing
  • US11384300B2 patent drawing
  • US11384300B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The processes and systems herein integrate hydroprocessing and coking in a manner to effectively upgrade/desulfurize crude oil feedstocks. An initial liquid hydrocarbon feedstock, such as crude oil, is upgraded by fractionating both the hydrocarbon feedstock and coker thermally cracked hydrocarbon products in a fractionating zone. A coker recycle stream is thermally cracked to produce coker thermally cracked hydrocarbon products that are passed to the fractionating zone. The hydrocarbon distillates are hydroprocessed under conditions effective for desulfurization and conversion into lighter hydrocarbon distillates to produce a hydroprocessed liquid hydrocarbon effluent, such as a bottomless synthetic crude oil.