Cruise Control Verification and Operator Notification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cruise control systems in motor vehicles often fail to properly disengage when certain control inputs are activated, leading to potential inappropriate vehicle speed control, and there is a need for verification and notification features to ensure safe operation.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that verify the operational status of control input monitoring systems, such as service brake pressure sensors and clutch pedals, and notify the operator if the cruise control is disabled, providing instructions for regaining operability through visual, auditory, or haptic feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the cruise control system monitors control inputs (brake pedal, clutch pedal) to detect disengagement, then the reliability of cruise control operation is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional sensors and monitoring systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecruise control disengagement reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol input monitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs functionality checks of control input monitoring systems before enabling cruise control operation. This preliminary verification ensures that sensors and monitoring circuits are operational, preventing future disengagement failures without requiring complex continuous monitoring of all system components during cruise operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to the operator through notifications when control input monitoring systems fail functionality checks. This feedback mechanism alerts the operator to system issues while maintaining relatively simple monitoring architecture by only requiring failure detection and notification rather than complex real-time verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system performs functionality checks before enabling cruise control, then the safety and reliability are improved, but the loss of time occurs during the verification process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecruise control operational reliabilityVSAvoidtime for functionality checks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Functionality checks are performed during system initialization or before cruise control enablement, completing verification in advance rather than during active operation. This approach minimizes time loss by ensuring system readiness before critical operation begins, rather than interrupting ongoing cruise control functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs targeted functionality checks on specific control input monitoring components rather than comprehensive testing of all cruise control systems. This partial verification approach achieves sufficient reliability assurance while reducing the time required for functionality checks to acceptable levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of information

If the system notifies the operator of cruise control inoperability, then the information completeness is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional notification mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator awareness of system statusVSAvoidnotification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The notification system utilizes existing vehicle output devices such as display screens, audio systems, or indicator lights that are already part of the vehicle's standard instrumentation. By repurposing these multi-functional components for cruise control status notification, the system provides complete operator information without adding dedicated notification hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the vehicle's existing communication and display infrastructure as an intermediary to convey cruise control status information to the operator. Rather than implementing direct notification mechanisms, the system leverages the vehicle's established information delivery channels, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive operator awareness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8126627B2Cruise control system having verification and/or notification features
Publication Date: 2012.02.28 PACCAR INC
  • US8126627B2 patent drawing
  • US8126627B2 patent drawing
  • US8126627B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Cruise control systems and methods suitable for use in vehicles, such as Class 8 trucks, are provided. For example, cruise control systems are disclosed that include verification and/or notification features for verifying the operational condition of the cruise control system, and if non-operational, notifies the vehicle operator of system inoperability and/or instructs the operator to activate a specified control input, e.g., press and release the clutch pedal, the service brake pedal, the parking brake, etc., so that cruise control functionality may be enabled.