Single Hull Cruise Vessel Cabin Layout

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing single hull cruise vessels face limitations in maximizing passenger cabins with windows or balconies due to narrow cabin designs, which compromise passenger comfort and efficiency in space utilization, as well as stability and weather constraints that restrict deck height and cabin placement.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of two separate superstructures along the hull's edges, with cabins arranged in two rows and a substantial open space between them, allowing for wider and shorter cabins with perimeter placement of fixtures, and centralizing common spaces below, enabling a more efficient and comfortable cabin layout.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If cabins are made narrow to maximize the number of cabins per deck, then the number of cabins increases, but passenger comfort and practicality deteriorate due to corridor-like wasted space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of cabinsVSAvoidpassenger comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the cabin dimensionality ratio by making cabins wider and shorter (width at least 50% of length) instead of narrow and long, fundamentally altering the spatial configuration to eliminate corridor waste while maintaining capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of maximizing cabin count by narrowing cabins, the patent inverts the approach by widening cabins and using vertical stacking (multiple decks) to achieve high capacity without compromising comfort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Ease of operation

If common spaces are placed on top decks to maximize visibility and accessibility, then passenger convenience improves, but the number of cabins that can be accommodated decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger convenienceVSAvoidnumber of cabins
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes the vertical dimension by placing common spaces on lower decks and stacking cabins vertically above them, transforming the horizontal trade-off into a vertical solution that accommodates both requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The vessel is segmented into distinct functional zones: lower decks for common spaces and upper decks for cabins, with separate superstructures on each side allowing independent optimization of each zone

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If window width is increased to improve views, then passenger comfort improves, but cabin width must increase reducing the number of cabins per deck

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveview qualityVSAvoidnumber of cabins
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent shifts from horizontal cabin arrangement to vertical stacking, allowing wide windows in each cabin while maintaining high capacity through multi-deck configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The loss of horizontal cabin capacity is counterbalanced by gaining vertical deck space, where multiple levels of wide cabins compensate for reduced cabins per single deck

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Data Source

PatentEP2398693B1Single hull cruise vessel
Publication Date: 2015.04.01 MEYER TURKU
  • EP2398693B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2398693B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2398693B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A floating structure, vessel, specifically a single hull cruise vessel, or the like, having an elongated hull part (1) and, on top of it, at least one multi-level superstructure (2a, 2b) containing the majority of passenger accommodations. The edges of the hull part (1) are fitted with two separate superstructures (2a, 2b) extending in the longitudinal direction of the vessel and dimensioned in the lateral direction so that a substantially open free space remains in between, said space being wider (g) than the combined width (a + b) of the superstructures (2a, 2b) excluding any balcony structures associated with accommodations. In addition that a majority, preferably at least 60%, of the accommodations within the superstructure (2a, 2b) comprises cabins (3) whose width (e), in other words their dimension in the longitudinal direction of the vessel, is at least some 50% of their length (f).