Crush-Resistant Fiber Optic Cable Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional multi-fiber optic cables with small diameters are prone to damage from crushing forces due to the absence of strength members and protective coatings, leading to signal attenuation or loss from sharp bends in optical fibers.

Innovation Solution

A crush-resistant fiber optic cable design featuring bend-resistant multimode optical fibers with a tensile-strength layer of aramid yarn and a protective cover, eliminating central strength members to maintain a small diameter while enhancing resistance to crushing forces through a combination of a tensile-strength layer and a protective cover.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional optical fibers with protective coatings are used, then fiber protection is improved, but cable diameter increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiber protectionVSAvoidcable diameter
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the protective coating from individual optical fibers to reduce cable diameter. By extracting the coating layer, the fiber diameter is reduced from 900 microns (tight buffered) to 250 microns, allowing multiple fibers to be packed more densely while relying on the cable structure itself for protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies a lubricant coating to the bare fibers before cable assembly. This lubricant layer provides protection and reduces friction during installation, compensating for the removal of the traditional protective coating while maintaining fiber integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Strength

If central strength members are included in the cable, then tensile strength is improved, but cable diameter increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidcable diameter
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the central strength member (such as a steel rod or aramid yarn core) from the cable construction. By removing this central element, the cable diameter is reduced, allowing for tighter fiber packing while maintaining flexibility and small form factor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent integrates the strength function directly into the cable jacket and surrounding layers rather than using a separate central strength member. The tensile strength is distributed throughout the cable structure through the jacket material and fiber arrangement, combining multiple functions into a unified design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Volume of moving object

If multiple optical fibers are packed densely to reduce cable diameter, then space efficiency is improved, but resistance to crushing forces deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable diameterVSAvoidcrushing resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a composite cable structure combining lubricant-coated bare fibers with a specifically designed cable jacket and surrounding layers. This composite construction provides both small diameter and crushing resistance, with each layer contributing different protective functions while maintaining overall compactness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state and properties of the cable materials to optimize both compactness and protection. The lubricant coating alters surface properties to reduce friction and provide protection, while the cable jacket material is selected for optimal balance between flexibility and crush resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Quantity of substance

If protective coatings are removed to increase fiber density, then fiber count per cable is improved, but susceptibility to damage from crushing forces increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiber countVSAvoiddamage susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a lubricant coating as an intermediary layer on the bare fibers. This lubricant acts as a mediator that provides protection and reduces friction during installation, compensating for the removal of the traditional protective coating while allowing high fiber density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The lubricant coating is applied to fibers before cable assembly, providing beforehand protection that prevents damage during installation and operation. This pre-applied protective layer cushions the bare fibers against mechanical stresses while maintaining compact cable construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS8965158B2Crush-resistant fiber optic cable
Publication Date: 2015.02.24 CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC
  • US8965158B2 patent drawing
  • US8965158B2 patent drawing
  • US8965158B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A crush-resistant fiber optic cable is disclosed, wherein the cable includes a plurality of optical fibers. The fibers are generally arranged longitudinally about a central axis, with no strength member arranged along the central axis. A tensile-strength layer surrounds the plurality of optical fibers. A protective cover surrounds the tensile-strength layer and has an outside diameter DO in the range 3 mm≦DO≦5 mm.