Impact Crusher Apron Pre-Load and Reset Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional impact crushers face issues with uncrushable oversize material generating forces that exceed spring-load limits, causing the apron to move away from the rotor, and lack efficient mechanisms for re-setting the working position and preventing apron-rotor collision.

Innovation Solution

An impact crusher design featuring a pre-loaded apron with a mechanical stop, allowing it to pivot away from the rotor when excessive forces are detected and automatically return to its normal position, using a pressure cylinder or linear motor for pre-loading and a suspension member with adjustable mechanical stop for controlled positioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a spring-loaded apron is used to provide reaction force against crushing forces, then the apron can maintain its working position during normal operation, but uncrushable oversize material may generate forces exceeding the spring-load, causing the apron to move away from the rotor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapron position stabilityVSAvoidexcessive force from uncrushable material
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The apron is made dynamically responsive to force conditions through the spring-loaded mechanism, allowing it to automatically move away from the rotor when excessive forces are applied (such as from uncrushable material) and return to its working position when the force is removed. This dynamic behavior protects the system from damage while maintaining operational reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spring-loaded mechanism provides beforehand cushioning by absorbing and accommodating excessive forces before they can cause damage to the apron-rotor assembly. The spring absorbs the energy from uncrushable material impacts, preventing direct transmission of harmful forces to the rotor and other chamber components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Ease of operation

If an hydraulic cylinder arrangement is used to set and reset the apron working position, then the position can be adjusted and restored after uncrushable material passage, but the system becomes more complex and requires additional components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapron position adjustment and resettingVSAvoidhydraulic cylinder and proximity sensor system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spring-loaded mechanism provides self-service functionality, automatically resetting the apron to its working position after it has moved away due to excessive forces. The system uses the removal of the causing condition (uncrushable material) as the trigger for automatic return, eliminating the need for external hydraulic reset mechanisms and proximity sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts and eliminates the hydraulic cylinder and proximity sensor components from the system, replacing them with a simpler spring-loaded mechanical mechanism that achieves the same functional outcomes of position setting and automatic resetting through pure mechanical means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Stability of the object's composition

If the apron is held at a fixed distance from the rotor against a mechanical stop, then the working position is stable during normal operation, but the apron cannot automatically respond to excessive forces from uncrushable material

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapron-rotor spacing stabilityVSAvoidapron response to force variations
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines a mechanical stop for normal position stability with a spring-loaded mechanism that provides dynamic response to force variations. During normal operation, the apron rests against the mechanical stop at a fixed, stable position. When excessive forces occur, the spring-loaded mechanism enables the apron to move away from the rotor, and automatically return when the force is removed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the reliability and safety of the crusher by reducing wear, enabling simple re-setting of the apron position and preventing apron-rotor collision, while allowing for controlled adjustment of the distance between the rotor and apron.

Implementation Method 1

the apron may be spring-loaded to provide a reaction against said forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring-load: Spring

Implementation Method 2

the apron is coupled to a first arrangement for applying pre-load to the apron

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 3

a second arrangement for providing a mechanical stop against which the apron is suspended in normal use

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical constraint: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 4

the rotor being configured for striking feed material present in the crushing chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS8033489B2Impact crusher
Publication Date: 2011.10.11 TEREX GB LTD
  • US8033489B2 patent drawing
  • US8033489B2 patent drawing
  • US8033489B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An impact crusher includes a crushing chamber, a rotor mounted in the crushing chamber, and an apron having an impact surface, said apron being movably positioned within the chamber. The apron is pre-loaded to oppose forces generated within the crushing chamber. The apron is free to move away from the rotor in the event that the forces generated within the chamber exceed a predetermined threshold. During normal use, the apron is suspended within the chamber against a mechanical stop, and the apron is free to return to its initial suspended position after the removal of uncrushable material from the chamber.