Gyratory Crusher Spider Assembly With Support Wings and Seating Segments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spider assemblies for gyratory crushers, such as ring and bone spiders, face issues with weight, durability, and installation complexity, which affect their ability to withstand crushing forces and require frequent maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A spider assembly with a pair of spider arms having support wings attached to seating segments on the upper rim of the top shell, featuring a beam and receiving channel design that provides secure attachment and reduced weight, enhancing stability and ease of installation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a ring spider is used, then the spider is durable and easy to align during installation, but the spider is heavy and cumbersome during installation and requires a relatively large number of bolts

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidspider weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The spider is divided into multiple segments including a central hub, multiple arms (typically three), and support wings. Each arm is a separate component that can be independently manufactured and assembled, reducing the weight handling requirements during installation while maintaining structural integrity through the segmented design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The spider arms extend radially outward from the central hub in a dimensional arrangement that distributes weight and loading paths. The support wings extend perpendicular to the arms, creating a three-dimensional structure that achieves durability through geometric distribution of forces rather than simply increasing mass

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If a ring spider is used, then the spider is durable, but the spider requires a relatively large number of bolts to attach to the top shell

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespider durabilityVSAvoidnumber of bolts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous outer ring of the traditional ring spider is extracted and replaced with discrete arms that extend from the central hub. This eliminates the need for a complete circular attachment system, reducing the number of bolts required while maintaining the structural durability needed to withstand crushing forces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The spider is segmented into a central hub and multiple discrete arms, each with support wings. This segmentation allows for fewer, more strategically positioned attachment points compared to a continuous ring, reducing bolt quantity while preserving durability through proper load distribution across the segmented structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Weight of moving object

If a bone spider is used, then the overall weight is decreased and the number of bolts is reduced, but the spider is not as robust and stiff and requires special devices and grouting for installation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespider weightVSAvoidspider robustness
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The spider arms and support wings are constructed as composite structures combining different material properties or structural configurations. The arms provide primary load-bearing strength while the extended support wings add structural rigidity and stability, achieving robustness without requiring the full weight of a traditional ring spider

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The support wings are pre-positioned and extend outward to provide inherent stability during installation. This preliminary structural arrangement eliminates the need for special installation devices or grouting by providing built-in mechanical stability and alignment features that facilitate straightforward installation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Length of stationary object

If a bone spider is used, then the feeding height is reduced, but the spider requires special devices and grouting to fix to the upper rim

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeeding heightVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The spider is segmented into a compact central hub and radiating arms with support wings, eliminating the need for a tall outer ring structure. This segmentation achieves reduced feeding height while the support wings provide inherent stability that simplifies installation, eliminating the need for grouting or special fixing devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260014567A1Spider assembly for use with a gyratory crusher
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 METSO OUTOTEC USA INC
  • US20260014567A1 patent drawing
  • US20260014567A1 patent drawing
  • US20260014567A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A gyratory crusher and spider for use with the gyratory crusher. The spider includes a pair of spider arms extending from a center hub. Each of the spider arms includes a lower end having a pair of support wings extending in opposite directions from the lower end. The upper top shell of the gyratory crusher includes an upper flange having a generally planar top surface. A pair of seating segments are included on the top surface of the upper flange in spaced locations corresponding to the support wings of the spider arms. The seating segments each receive the support wings on the spider arms to provide a mount for the spider on the top shell. The portions of the upper flange not including the seating segments are planar, which reduces the height of the gyratory crusher.