3D Molecular Structure Estimation via Stochastic Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining 3D structures of molecules from Cryo-EM images face challenges such as poor initialization leading to incorrect solutions, slow convergence, and high computational costs, especially with large datasets and low signal-to-noise ratios, limiting the resolution and accuracy of molecular structure reconstruction.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing Stochastic Gradient Descent for optimizing a probabilistic model of 3D structures from 2D Cryo-electron microscope particle images, incorporating importance sampling to efficiently marginalize over unknown poses and positions, allowing for robust and fast reconstruction of high-resolution structures without prior knowledge.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional methods are used for 3D structure reconstruction from Cryo-EM images, then the reconstruction can be performed with existing algorithms, but the convergence is slow and computational costs are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereconstruction speedVSAvoidconvergence time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the 3D structure reconstruction problem into a probabilistic optimization problem by changing the parameter representation from direct structural coordinates to probability distributions over possible structures. This allows the use of stochastic gradient descent and importance sampling techniques, which converge faster than traditional iterative reconstruction methods while handling the uncertainty inherent in low signal-to-noise ratio Cryo-EM data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If traditional optimization methods are used, then the implementation is straightforward, but the computational costs are high especially for large datasets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm complexityVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the optimization process into two distinct phases: (1) determining a probabilistic model that captures the uncertainty and relationships in the data, and (2) optimizing this probabilistic model using stochastic gradient descent. This segmentation allows each phase to be optimized independently, reducing the overall computational burden compared to applying a single complex optimization algorithm to the entire reconstruction problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The probabilistic model automatically adapts to the characteristics of the input data through importance sampling, which efficiently identifies and focuses computational resources on the most probable structural configurations. This self-service mechanism reduces the need for manual parameter tuning and iterative refinement, lowering computational costs while maintaining accuracy for large datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If poor initialization is used in traditional methods, then the process is simpler to start, but incorrect solutions are obtained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitialization simplicityVSAvoidsolution accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a probabilistic model as an intermediary between the raw Cryo-EM images and the final 3D structure reconstruction. This probabilistic representation acts as a mediator that gracefully handles poor initialization by distributing probability mass across multiple plausible structures, allowing the optimization process to explore the solution space more effectively and converge to the correct structure even from random or poor initial conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If high resolution reconstruction is pursued, then the structural detail is improved, but the computational costs and time requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural resolutionVSAvoidreconstruction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic importance sampling where the sampling distribution adapts throughout the optimization process. Early in the optimization, broader sampling explores low-resolution features, while as convergence progresses, the sampling automatically focuses on high-probability regions corresponding to high-resolution structural details. This dynamic adaptation achieves high resolution reconstruction without the exponential time cost that would result from uniformly high-resolution processing throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11515002B2Methods and systems for 3D structure estimation
Publication Date: 2022.11.29 STRUCTURA BIOTECHNOLOGY INC
  • US11515002B2 patent drawing
  • US11515002B2 patent drawing
  • US11515002B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are systems and methods for efficient 3D structure estimation from images of a transmissive object, including cryo-EM images. The method generally comprises, receiving a set of 2D images of a target specimen from an electron microscope, carrying out a reconstruction technique to determine a likely molecular structure, and outputting the estimated 3D structure of the specimen. The described reconstruction technique comprises: establishing a probabilistic model of the target structure; optimizing using stochastic optimization to determine which structure is most likely; and, optionally utilizing importance sampling to minimize computational burden.