Cryogenic Air Separation Pressure Control for Oxygen Pipelines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Air separation units (ASUs) face inefficiencies when supplying oxygen to pipelines with varying pressures, as they are designed to operate at constant pressures, leading to power consumption increases when pipeline pressure decreases.

Innovation Solution

The method involves designing ASU equipment and implementing a process control strategy to automatically adjust the production pressure of air gases (nitrogen and oxygen) to match pipeline pressure, using a control loop to adjust the discharge pressure of the booster air compressor and liquid oxygen pump, allowing the gaseous oxygen feed valve to be fully open and controlling the flow with a flow indicator controller.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the ASU is designed to operate at constant pressure, then the production efficiency is improved, but the power consumption increases when pipeline pressure decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies dynamics by transitioning from constant pressure operation to variable pressure operation. The ASU pressure is dynamically adjusted to follow pipeline pressure variations, allowing the system to adapt its operating conditions in real-time. This resolves the contradiction by enabling the system to maintain production efficiency while reducing power consumption during low pipeline pressure periods through automated pressure tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the pressure parameter from a fixed constant value to a variable that tracks pipeline pressure. By implementing automated control that continuously adjusts ASU output pressure based on pipeline pressure feedback, the system optimizes energy consumption while maintaining operational efficiency across varying demand conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the ASU pressure is set above the highest pipeline pressure, then the oxygen can be supplied to the pipeline, but power is wasted when pipeline pressure is below design pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxygen supply capabilityVSAvoidpower waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention implements feedback control where pipeline pressure is continuously monitored and fed back to the ASU control system. This feedback loop enables the ASU to automatically adjust its output pressure to match actual pipeline pressure, ensuring reliable oxygen supply while eliminating energy waste from operating at unnecessarily high pressures when pipeline pressure is lower.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If a control valve is used to let down pressure, then the pressure mismatch is resolved, but efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure matching capabilityVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies preliminary action by adjusting the ASU output pressure in advance to match pipeline pressure requirements, rather than using control valves to reduce pressure after production. This proactive pressure matching eliminates the need for throttling and maintains operational efficiency while achieving pressure adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces power consumption and maintains process stability by matching the air gas product pressure with the pipeline pressure, resulting in significant power savings without affecting flow rate or operational stability.

Implementation Method 1

compressing atmospheric air in the main air compressor to a pressure suitable for the cryogenic separation of air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

cooling the compressed air stream in a heat exchanger by indirect heat exchange against process streams from the cryogenic distillation column

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 3

separating the air stream into a nitrogen stream and an oxygen stream in a cryogenic distillation column

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCryogenic separation: Distillation

Data Source

PatentUS10302356B2Method for the production of air gases by the cryogenic separation of air
Publication Date: 2019.05.28 LAIR LIQUIDE SA POUR LETUDE & LEXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE
  • US10302356B2 patent drawing
  • US10302356B2 patent drawing
  • US10302356B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for the production of air gases by the cryogenic separation of air can include the steps of sending a purified and compressed air stream to a cold box under conditions effective for cryogenically separating the air stream into an oxygen product and nitrogen using a system of columns, wherein the purified and compressed air stream is at a feed pressure when entering the system of columns; withdrawing the oxygen product at a product pressure; delivering the oxygen product at a delivery pressure to an oxygen pipeline, wherein the oxygen pipeline has a pipeline pressure; wherein during the second mode of operation, the method can include monitoring the pipeline pressure; and reducing the difference between the pipeline pressure and the delivery pressure. By operating the method in a dynamic fashion, a power savings can be realized in instances in which the pipeline pressure deviates from its highest value.