Apparatus and method for separating air by cryogenic distillation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing air separation processes face inefficiencies due to large turbine sizes and non-standardized, low-efficiency cryogenic turbines, requiring complex regulation and high energy consumption, especially when producing oxygen-enriched gases.

Innovation Solution

A double-column air separation apparatus with a single-stage compressor and optimized expansion ratios, utilizing a single-stage blower and a turbine for air purification at reduced pressures, minimizing energy consumption and turbine size.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If all the air flow going to the second column is expanded in the turbine to maximize energy gain, then energy efficiency is improved, but the turbine size becomes at least 4 to 5 times larger due to the volume flow rate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidturbine size
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The air flow to the second column is divided into two separate streams: one stream (first flow rate) is expanded in the turbine to generate energy, while the other stream (second flow rate) bypasses the turbine and enters the second column directly. This segmentation allows the turbine to be sized for a smaller, manageable flow rate rather than handling the entire air flow, thus reducing turbine size while still capturing energy from a portion of the stream.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If the cooling capacity is fixed and remains low, then the turbine expansion ratio becomes very low, but this results in an inefficient turbine and non-existent standardized turbines among cryogenic turbine suppliers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacityVSAvoidturbine efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the operating parameters of the turbine by adjusting the expansion ratio to fall within the conventional range of 4:1 to 10:1, despite the fixed low cooling capacity. This is achieved by carefully controlling the first flow rate through the turbine and the second flow rate bypassing it, allowing the turbine to operate at an optimized expansion ratio that ensures efficiency and compatibility with standardized turbine designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the scrubbing pressure is regulated by adjusting the pressure upstream of the turbine, then cooling capacity regulation is achieved, but the regulation process becomes significantly complicated and necessitates sizing the scrubbing system for the lowest possible pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacity regulationVSAvoidregulation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The air flow is segmented into two independent paths: one through the turbine and one bypassing it. This allows independent control of each stream, simplifying the regulation of cooling capacity by adjusting the split between the two streams rather than complicating the overall pressure regulation system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces an intermediary flow distribution mechanism that separates the air stream into two paths, allowing the turbine to operate at a fixed optimized pressure while the bypass stream handles pressure variations. This intermediary segmentation decouples the complexity of pressure regulation from the turbine operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Quantity of substance

If the expansion ratio is low between 1.2:1 and 3.8:1, then the turbine operates outside the conventional range, but this significantly degrades turbine efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair flow rateVSAvoidturbine efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the expansion ratio parameter to fall within the conventional efficient range of 4:1 to 10:1 by adjusting the flow distribution between the turbine stream and bypass stream. This parameter optimization ensures the turbine operates at peak efficiency while still handling the required air flow rates for the air separation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus achieves a 1-2% reduction in energy consumption and avoids inefficient turbine operation by using a smaller, standardized turbine, ensuring efficient air separation with optimized airflow distribution.

Implementation Method 1

cooled in a heat exchanger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

expanded in a turbine coupled to the blower

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbine expansion: Turbine

Implementation Method 3

purified of water and carbon dioxide in a purification unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 4

separating air by cryogenic distillation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCryogenic distillation: Distillation

Data Source

PatentEP3899389B1Apparatus and method for separating air by cryogenic distillation
Publication Date: 2026.04.01 LAIR LIQUIDE SA POUR LETUDE & LEXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE
  • EP3899389B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

An apparatus for separating air, comprising a double column (K3, K4), means (B) for sending air to the purification unit at a pressure that is no more than 1 bar higher than atmospheric pressure, a pipe for sending a first air flow (8), which has been purified in the purification unit, to the heat exchanger at a fourth pressure that is no more than 1 bar higher than the second pressure, a pipe for sending the first purified air flow, which has been cooled in the heat exchanger, to the second column for separation, and a booster compressor (E), the apparatus not comprising any means for depressurising the first flow.